Research Article
Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Iraqi Patients
Assistant professor of urology college of medicine, Al iraqia university, Baghdad, Iraq.
*Corresponding Author: Jihad Anad Khalef,Assistant professor of urology college of medicine, Al iraqia university, Baghdad, Iraq.
Citation: Jihad Anad Khalef. (2024). Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Iraqi Patients. Journal of Surgical Case Reports and Reviews, BRS Publishers. 3(1); DOI: 10.59657/jscr.brs.23.011
Copyright: © 2024 Jihad Anad Khalef, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: May 22, 2023 | Accepted: November 01, 2023 | Published: January 03, 2024
Abstract
Background: the PCNL is modern era of treatment of renal stone more than 2 cm size, the adding of advance visual technology, lithotripters and localizing radiological methods increase the safety of this surgery.
Patients and methods: the study was done over twenty-six patients, from January 2021 to September 2022 in Baghdad after all radiological and chemical investigations established, cystoscope insertion of ureteral stent by fluoroscopic guidance then the dye inserted, the triangulation method for needle insertion, the dilatation up 26 f by implants dilator, the rigid nephoscope of story was used, lithalsa pneumatic lithotripter used, for unreachable calyx the flexible nephoscope with laser lithotripsy to ensure stone free.
Results: for twenty-six patient the age range (19-65), 9 females, 17 males, stone range 2-6.5cm, 22 patient single tract via post calyx, 4 patients lower in upper calyx. 20 patients presented with complete stone free, 4 patients need 2nd PCNL session, and 2 patients need post PCNL ESWL sessions. Massive hematuria in one patient needs blood transfusion, 16 patients undergo post op fever.
Conclusion: PCNL safe and effective method in large renal stone higher than 2cm.
Keywords: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; laser lithotripsy; pneumatic lithotripsy; implants dilator
Introduction
The Urinary calculi are the third most common condition of the urinary tract, following to UTI and prostate conditions [1] The ppercutaneous approach to kidney was first described in 1955 by Goodwin and colleague.2The standard PCNL procedure consists of percutaneous access to the kidney and the formation of tract connecting the skin surface with the renal collecting system to allow endoscopic stone fragmentation and removal. A temporary nephrostomy tube is usually left in place at the end of the procedure to tamponade bleeding, and allows drainage and delayed second-look nephoscopy [3].
In old time the surgical treatment to a urologist for management of larger renal stone were limited to open surgical techniques such as pyelolithotomy and nephrolithotomy. As these new techniques have been increasingly adopted and the practice perfected, there has been a much more reduction in morbidity and complications from renal stone disease [4]. PCNL needs a large percutaneous tract into the renal PCS to passage of the nephoscope, and then tract dilation is an aim, which can occur complicated cases in some cases, such as those with scar tissue from previous procedures [5-8].
Patients and methods
The study was done in Baghdad, twenty-six patients, from January 2021 to September 2022. The routine pre operation evaluation all patients with medical and anesthesia fitness. Aim of study is to fellow up outcome and complications of PCNL surgery. Inclusion criteria age > 12 y, renal stone > 2cm, casting stag horn, no bleeding problem, no UTI, no renal tumor. Exclusion criteria: age < 12>Cystoscope is done, then ureteral stent inserted, turn the patient to prone position, inject the contrast to PCS, take two fluoroscopic views at 0 and 30 degrees. After locate the appropriate calyx, the needle inserted to it and coaxial implant dilator, some patients need other insertion by sacricostal puncture.
The nephoscope Karl Storz 27092AMA Hopkins 6˚ Percutaneous Nephoscopes W/ 28161FKS + 28161OK, Both pneumatic lithotripter (lithalsa), laser lithotripsy (quanta 45 w). Flexible nephoscope was used for minor calyces unreachable by rigid nephoscope. All patients use foleys catheter which is removed day 1 post op, nephrostomy also removed day 1 post op, double jj which is removed after 21 days post-operation. Patient discharge home day 1. Statistical study is done by IBM SPSS 26, P-value <0>
Results
The study was done retrospectively over twenty-six patients, age range (19-65), mean (42 years), fifteen patients were male (58%), nine patients were female (42%). All patients the prone position (100%). in twenty-two patients the posterior lower calyx puncture was used alone (85%), in other four patients need to add other sacricostal puncture to middle or upper posterior calyx (15%). Stone size from 2-6.5 cm (mean=4.25 cm). In twenty patients there was complete stone free from one session (77%), in other six cases residual stone, four of them solved by post PCNL EWSL (15%), other two cases need other session of PCNL (7%). One case undergoes massive hematuria day three post-operation (4%) need blood transfusion, plasma transfusion, get better after one week. Three patients need one unit of blood due intra-operation blood loss (12%), track pain occur in all patients in first 24 hours and subsiding with time. Fever occurs in sixteen patients post operation, good response to ceftriaxone injection with antipyretic.
Table 1: outcome of PCNL
Number | Percentage % | |
Total number of patients | 26 | 100 |
Age range | 19-65 | |
Female patients | 9 | 42 |
Male patients | 17 | 58 |
Stone size | 2cm-6.5cm | |
Lower post calyx | 22 | 85 |
Lower with upper calyx | 4 | 15 |
Stone free from first session | 20 | 77 |
2nd session PCNL | 4 | 15 |
Post PCNL ESWL | 2 | 7 |
Massive hematuria | 1 | 4 |
Simple blood transfusion | 3 | 12 |
Track pain | 26 | 100 |
Fever | 16 | 62 |
Discussion
The PCNL surgery is replacing the open pyelolithotomy in last decades even in staghorn stone, also used in management of some pathologies like tumors and PUJO. The technologies of laser and other types of lithotripters and visual scops advancements with further experience led to more increase in the effect of surgery.
Some of patients undergo of residual stone because either of big stone burden or difficulty of access the calyx, which are successfully treated by post operation ESWL. For those patients with hematuria due to intake anticoagulant therapy and denied any history so treated with conservative therapy. The track pain is due to cutaneous skin innervation, good response to ordinary analgesia. The fever due anesthesia reaction or infection, there is good response to antipyretic and antibiotic. In comparison with Shahzad Ali et al [9]. In 175 patients, 62.86% (n=110) were male and the mean age was 35 ± 9.56 years. One hundred and seventeen (66.85% patients were primarily stone free and 13.71% (n=24) patients needed a second look procedure, thus, a total of 80.57% (n=141) patients were stone free in the same admission. Complications included failure in 4.0% (n=7) patients, bleeding in 8.57% (n=15) patients, a small residual stone in 15.43% (n=27) patients; and puncture site pain almost in every patient. Transient fever occurred in 55.43% (n=97) patients, urinary leakage in 8.57% (n=15) patients, urinary tract infections in 5.14% (n=9) patients, ureteric colic in 3.43% (n=6) patients, colonic injury in 0.57% (n=1) patient; and nephrectomy was required in 0.57% (n=1) patient due to severe bleeding. One patient (0.57%) expired due to anaesthesia complications.
Conclusion
The PCNL surgery is safe and less destructive surgery in comparison to open surgery in treatment of stone disease even for those staghorn stone, also can be used in upper ureteral stone and to PUJ obstruction.
The procedure needs more advance technique especially in port insertion and localization of stone especially in upper kidney calyx which have complex vascular system with risk of bleeding.
References
- Stoller, ML. Urinary Stone Disease. In: McNinch, J.W. and Lue, T.F., Eds. (2013). Smith & Tango’s General Urology, 18th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 249-272.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W. (1995). Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc, 157:891-894.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Safer, M., et al. (2010). Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: First 200 Cases in Israel. Israel medical Association Journal, 12:164-167.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Khan FA, Khan JH. (2007). Stone survey of Punjab hospitals. Pak Post Med J 1990; 1:7-13.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Taneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol, 51:899-906.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Turna B, Nazli O, Demiryoguran S, Mammadov R, Cal C. (2007). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: variables that influence haemorrhage. Urology, 69:603-607.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Lopes T, Sangam K, Alken P, Barroilhet BS, Saussine C, Shi L, et al. (2011). The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: tract dilation comparisons in 5537 patients. J Endourol, 25: 755-62.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Wezel F, Mamoulakis C, Rioja J, Michel MS, de la Rosette J, Alken P. (2009). Two contemporary series of percutaneous tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol, 23:1655-1661.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Falahatkar S, Neiroomand H, Akbarpour M, Emadi SA, Khaki N. (2009). One-shot versus metal telescopic dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of safety and efficacy. J Endourol, 23:615-8.
Publisher | Google Scholor - shahzad Ali, et al. (2014). Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 24(4):261-264
Publisher | Google Scholor