Research Article
Stroke Secondary to Giant Cell Arteritis in a Moroccan Population-Based Cohort of 40 Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis and Literature Review
1Neurology department, Military hospital Avicenne. Marrakech. Morocco.
2Neuroscience research laboratory. Marrakech Medical school, Cadi Ayyad university; Marrakesh, Morocco.
*Corresponding Author: Oumerzouk Jawad, Neurology department, Military hospital Avicenne. Marrakech. Morocco.
Citation: Jawad O, Cherkaoui R. Oussama. (2024). Stroke Secondary to Giant Cell Arteritis in an Moroccan Population-Based Cohort of 40 Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis and Literature Review, International Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, BioRes Scientia Publishers. 2(2):1-16. DOI: 10.59657/2993-0855.brs.24.014
Copyright: © 2024 Oumerzouk Jawad, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: June 24, 2024 | Accepted: July 08, 2024 | Published: August 26, 2024
Abstract
Background: Ischemic stroke, less common than visual lesions, is a rare but important complication that occurs in 3% to 4% of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and is typically due to stenosis of carotid and/or vertebral arteries.
Material and Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective study in a cohort of 40 patients with GCA, from January 1991 through December 2008, from 2 different neurology departments in Marrakech. 3 patients presented GCA- related cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). All patients with intracranial (IC) involvement received treatment with oral or intravenous glucocorticoids, in combination with an immunosuppressant agent, methotrexate or tocilizumab.
Results: In our series, the main clinical presentations in patients GCA with CVA were headache (66.6%), and alteration of visual acuity (100%). Abnormal findings of temporal artery examination were present in 2 patients (66.6%). CVA was more frequent in patients with visual involvement (P = 0.02), especially permanent VL. Furthermore, The the patients with intracranial involvement less frequently presented with elevated ESR (33.3%). Posterior circulation arteries were affected in 1 (33.3%) and anterior circulation arteries in 2 (66.6%). Despite treatment, outcomes for patients with IC-GCA were poor. 1 patient (33.3%) with vertebrobasillar ischemic stroke had a rapid progressive disease course and died. The median mRS at follow-up 6 months after discharge in these patients was 3. Our results support the existence of a clinical subset of GCA patients who are more susceptible to the development of ischemic manifestations.
Discussion: Stroke in GCA patients is directly related to the inflammatory involvement of the internal arotid arteries (ICA), vertebral arteries (VA), and more seldom intracranial arteries, and is an uncommon manifestation of GCA, in which the absence of inflammatory syndrome and vision complications seems to be real predictors. Patients with neurologic symptoms and intracranial involvement may have a poor prognosis and fulminant course, even when treated with glucocorticoids and classical immunosuppressive agents, and strokes have been reported to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality as well as residual neurologic deficits in many survivors.
Conclusion: Further studies are needed to draw an increasingly accurate picture of the pathogenesis of GCAs. Such data will be needed to identify new diagnostic biomarkers, improving the diagnostic accuracy of GCAs, and to set up increasingly effective therapies that may avoid severe morbidity and high early mortality in such cases.
Keywords: headache; stroke; visual loss; giant cell; arteritis; steroids
Introduction
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is is a large-vessel vasculitis which affects persons over the age of 50 years, and is known to be common in Nordic populations. Several predisposing genetic factors have been identified, but it has emerged that epigenetic factors are essential in triggering the onset of the disease. It was therefore underlined that GCA should be classified into a cranial form (c-GCA) and an extracranial or large vessel form (LV-GCA). LV-GCA mainly involves the thoracic aorta and its branches and is the main cause of noninfectious aortitis in humans. Despite the systemic nature of involvement, GCA is considered a neuro-ophthalmologic emergency. Intracranial involvement in GCA (IC-GCA) is a rare and highly aggressive disease that is often resistant to steroid monotherapy. Ischemic stroke, less common than visual lesions, is a rare but important complication that occurs in 3% to 4% of patients and is typically due to stenosis of carotid and/or vertebral or basilar arteries. Despite immunosuppressive therapy, patients with intracranial involvement may have a fulminant course with neurological decline and progressing to death. It can be speculated that additional therapies may be available in the future that take advantage of new insights into the pathogenesis of GCA. We report 3 GCA patients with cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and severe prognosis despite immunosuppressants.
Material and Methods
We conducted a multi-center retrospective study in a cohort of patients with GCA with intracranial involvement, from January 1991 through December 2008, from 2 different neurology departments at the Mohamed V Military Hospital in Rabat and Avicenne Military Hospital in Marrakech (Morocco). We included 40 patients with the diagnosis of GCA who met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for GCA. Clinical (average age, sex, GCA symptoms), laboratory and radiological features of all patients with GCA with (n=3) and without (n=37) intracranial involvement included in the study after screening are depicted (Table 1 and 2). In the present study, we analyzed a large series of patients, in order to 1) assess the frequency, clinical features, clinical characteristics radiological characteristics, pattern of arterial involvement and response to treatment of cerebrovascular ischemic events with outcomes, 2) identify the best predictors for CVA in patients with GCA. Patients with GCA without intracranial involvement (n=37) served as controls.
Treatment and outcome information of patients with GCA with intracranial involvement (n=3) included in the study are depicted (Table 3).
Results
Demographics and clinical features
The baseline characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. We included 3 patients who developed stroke at the same time they presented with GCA symptoms and 37 patients with GCA without intracranial involvement. The median time from symptom onset until diagnosis of GCA was 5 days and did not differ between patients with and without involvement of intracranial arteries. Demographic characteristics did not differ between these two groups.
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of GCA study population
Variable | Patients with intracranial involvement (n= 3) | Patients without intracranial involvement (n=37) | P value |
Demographics | |||
Age, mean (SD), y | 68.6 | 71.5 | 0.46 |
Women, n (%) | 66.6 | 69.2 | 0.59 |
GCA symptoms, n (%) | |||
Visual disturbances | 3 (100%) | 26 (70.2%) | 0.02 |
Headache | 2 (66.6%) | 31 (83.7%) | 0.04 |
Jaw claudication | 1 (33.3%) | 14 (37.8%) | 0.36 |
Constitutional syndrome | 1 (33.3%) | 12 (32.43%) | 0.44 |
Polymyalgia rheumatica | 1 (33.3) | 12 (32.4%) | 0.86 |
STA abnormalities | 2 (66.6%) | 19 (51.3%) | 0.29 |
Laboratory findings, n (%) | |||
Elevated ESR | 1 (33.3%) | 32 (86.4%) | 0.03 |
Anemia (hemoglobin <110> | 1 (33.3%) | 10 (27%) | 0.43 |
Abnormal protein electrophoresis result | 1 (33.3%) | 15 (40.5%) | 0.62 |
Elevated liver enzyme levels | 1(33.3%) | 9 (24.3%) | 0.30 |
The most frequent symptoms at the time of GCA presentation in patients with cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) were new-onset headache (66.6%), alteration of visual acuity (100%), jaw claudication (33.3%), STA abnormalities (66.6%), constitutional syndrome (33.3%). Polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms were present in 33% of patients. CVA was more frequent in patients with visual involvement (P = 0.02), especially permanent VL. The CVA occurred shortly after the ocular symptoms (median 2.0 days), and the patients with intracranial involvement less frequently presented with elevated ESR (33.3%).
Diagnostic studies
In patients with GCA with intracranial involvement, focal neurological deficits due to intracranial vasculitis at disease onset mainly consisted of motor (33.3%), speech (33.3%) and cerebellar (33.3%) deficits (table 2). Of 3 patients with GCA with intracranial involvement, neuroimaging showed supratentorial ischemic strokes in 2 (66.6%) patients and infratentorial ischemic stroke in 1 patient (33.3%). Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed demonstrated schemic stroke in the territory of the internal carotid artery in 1 patient, middle cerebral artery in one patient, explaining the motor deficit found, and ischemic stroke in the vertebrobasilar territory (cerebellar stroke) in a one patient. Intracranial angiographic imaging modalities used included magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography (CTA). The most frequently affected arteries were the internal carotid artery (ICA; 33.3%), the vertebral artery (33.3%) and the middle cerebral artery (33.3%) (Table 2). The patient with cerebellar infarction had bilateral vertebral artery stenosis. Abnormal CSF was found in 1 (33.3%) patient including increased total protein.
Table 2: CNS affection in patients with GCA with intracranial involvement
Patients with intracranial involvement (n=3) | |
Focal neurological deficit, n (%) Cerebellar Motor Speech | 1 (33.3%) 1 (33.3%) 1 (33.3%) |
NIHSS score, median (IQR) At onset at disease course | 10 8 |
Affected arteries, n (%) Internal carotid artery Middle cerebral artery Vertebral artery | 1 (33.3%) 1 (33.3%) 1 (33.3%) |
Cerebral infarction, n (%) Carotid territory Cerebellar | 2 (66.6%) 1 (33.3%) |
Abnormal CSF Pleocytosis Increased protein level | 0 1 (33.3%) |
Treatment and outcomes
All patients with intracranial involvement received treatment with oral or intravenous glucocorticoids (1000 g daily for 5 days), in combination with an immunosuppressant agent, methotrexate or tocilizumab and 160 mg daily of Aspirin (Table 3). The mean starting dose of oral prednisone was 52.2 mg daily. Tocilizumab was added to the regimen for the patient with cerebellar infarction. Table 3 illustrates the clinical disease course and treatment strategies in these patients. Response to treatment was characterized by spectacular improvement of symptoms in all patients without intracranial involvement and no relapse during long term follow up (100%). However, despite treatment, outcomes for patients with IC-GCA were poor. In our study, the patient with cerebellar infarction had a rapid progressive disease course characterized by recurrent ischemic events and died within 3 months despite aggressive corticosteroid and supportive therapy. Follow-up 6 months after hospital discharge, showed higher level of disability in GCA patients with intracranial involvement (Table 3).
Table 3: Treatment and outcome of patients with intracranial involvement.
Patients with GCA with intracranial involvement (n=3) | Treatment | Modified Rankin scale, mRS at last follow-up |
1 | GC and MTX | 4 |
2 | GC and MTX | 6 |
3 | GC and tocilizumab | 2 |
GC, glucocorticoids; MTX, methotrexate
Discussion
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common primary vasculitis affecting the elderly population and constitutes an emergency due to possible devastating neurologic and ophthalmologic complications of the disease. Depending on the arteries primarily involved, the clinical presentation of GCA may vary from constitutional symptoms to amaurosis fugax, jaw, arm or leg claudication, headache, scalp tenderness and eventually stroke [1,2,3]. Severe cranial ischaemic complications (sCIC) , are defined as either severe vision complications [diplopia, transient vision loss and permanent vision defects (permanent vision loss PVL and partial vision field/acuity defect PVF/AD)] or stroke. [4] Visual manifestations of this disease are estimated between 26 and 30%, of whom 14.9
Conclusion
Cerebrovascular accidents secondary to GCA are an uncommon, difficult-to-treat and are usually associated with significant morbidity and mortality as well as residual neurologic deficits in many survivors. An improved understanding of the risk factors for ischaemic complications and early diagnosis of this disease is beneficial for the patient. Further studies are needed to draw an increasingly accurate picture of the pathogenesis of GCAs. Such data will be needed to identify new diagnostic biomarkers, improving the diagnostic accuracy of GCAs, and to set up increasingly effective therapies that may avoid severe morbidity and high early mortality in severe cases of GCA-related stroke.
Declarations
Limitations of the study
Interpretation and comparison of response to treatment is limited by the retrospective design of the study and the comparably small simple size.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest
Abbreviations
AION: anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy
AxAV: axillary artery vasculitis
AZA=azathioprine
CA=carotid arteries
CFX=cyclophosphamide
CIEs=cranial ischaemic events
CRP=C-reactive protein
ESR=erythrocyte sedimentation rate
FP = fusion protein
GCs= glucocorticoids
GCA=giant cell arteritis
GM-SSF = granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
IC= intracranial
IHD: ischaemic heart disease
IL = interleukin
JAK = Janus kinase
MOAB = monoclonal antibody
MMF=mycophenolate mofetil
mRS=modified Rankin Scale
NIHSS=National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
PCA=Posterior circulation arteries.
PMR=polymyalgia rheumatic
PVL=permanent visual loss
R = receptor
RRA = recombinant receptor antagonist
RTX=rituximab
S: stroke
SMOL = small molecule
STA=superficial temporal artery
TCZ=tocilizumab
TVL: transient vision loss
VA=vertebral arteries
VC: vision complication
↓: lower
↑: higher
References
- Pego-Reigosa R, Garcia-Porrua C, Piñeiro A, Dierssen T, Llorca J, Gonzalez-Gay MA. (2004). Predictors of cerebrovascular accidents in giant cell arteritis in a defined population. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 22(6 Suppl 36):S13-17.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Penet T, Lambert M, Baillet C, Outteryck O, Hénon H, Morell-Dubois S, Hachulla E et al. (2023). Giant cell arteritis-related cerebrovascular ischemic events: a French retrospective study of 271 patients, systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Arthritis Res Ther, 25(1):116.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ponte C, Martins-Martinho J, Luqmani RA. (2020). Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford), 59:iii5-iii16.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Gruener AM, Poostchi A, Carey AR, Eberhart CG, Henderson AD, Chang JR, et al. (2019). Association of Giant Cell Arteritis with Race. JAMA Ophthalmol, 137:1175-1179.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Yoon MK, Rizzo JF III. (2019). Giant Cell Arteritis in Black Patients: Do We Know How Rare It Is? JAMA Ophthalmology, 137:1180-1181.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Bajko Z, Balasa R, Maier S, Motataianu A, Barcutean L, Andone S, Stoian A, Filep RC. (2021). Stroke secondary to giant-cell arteritis: A literature review. Exp Ther Med, 22(2):876.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, Stevens MB, Arend WP et al. (1990). The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 33:1122-1128.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Maz M, Chung SA, Abril A, Langford CA, Gorelik M, Guyatt G, et al. (2021). American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis. Arthritis Care Res, 73:1071-1087.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Pache M, Kaiser HJ, Haufschild T, Lübeck P, Flammer J. (2002). Increased endothelin-1 plasma levels in giant cell arteritis: a report on four patients. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 133:160-162.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Russo MG, Waxman J, Abdoh AA, Serebro LH. (1995). Correlation between infection and the onset of the giant cell (temporal) arteritis syndrome. A trigger mechanism? Arthritis Rheum, 38:374-380.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Gonzalez-Gay MA, Vazquez-Rodriguez TR, Gomez-Acebo I, Pego-Reigosa R, Lopez-Diaz MJ et al. (2009). Strokes at time of disease diagnosis in a series of 287 patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis. Medicine (Baltimore), 88(4):227-235.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Weyand CM, Hicok KC, Hunder GG, Goronzy JJ. (1992). The HLA-DRB1 locus as a genetic component in giant cell arteritis. Mapping of a disease-linked sequence motif to the antigen binding site of the HLA-DR molecule. J Clin Invest, 90:2355-2361.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Nordborg E. (2000). Epidemiology of biopsy-positive giant cell arteritis: an overview. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 18:S15-17.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Eberhardt RT, Dhadly M. (2007). Giant Cell Arteritis: Diagnosis, Management, and Cardiovascular Implications. Cardiology in Review, 15:55-61.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Rodríguez-Pla A, Bosch-Gil JA, Rosselló-Urgell J, Huguet-Redecilla P, Stone JH, Vilardell-Tarres M. (2005). Metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in Giant Cell Arteritis: Involvement in Vascular Remodeling. Circulation, 112:264-269.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Zahraoui M, Bennis A, Tahiri A, Chraibi N. (1999). Infarctus du myocarde révélant une maladie de Horton. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris), 48:10-12.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Siemonsen S, Brekenfeld C, Holst B, Kaufmann-Buehler A-K, Fiehler J, T A Bley TA. (2015). 3T MRI Reveals Extra- and Intracranial Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 36(1):91-97.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ouraini S, Rouihi A, Nakkabi I, Benariba F. (2015). Acouphènes révélateurs de la maladie de Horton. The Pan African Medical Journal, 22.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Oerding C, Uhlmann F, Wollmann J, Kaden I, Wohlfarth K. (2021). Carotid Artery Stenosis and Ischemic Strokes in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis. TH Open, 6(1):e40-e49.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Kermani TA, Warrington KJ. (2011). Lower Extremity Vasculitis in Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 23:38-42.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Lie JT. (1995). Aortic and extracranial large vessel giant cell arteritis: a review of 72 cases with histopathologic documentation. Semin Arthritis Rheum, 24:422-431.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Cantini F, Niccoli L, Storri L, Nannini C, Olivieri I et al. (2004). Are polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis the same disease? Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 33:294-301.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Dejaco C, Duftner C, Buttgereit F, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B. (2016). The spectrum of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: revisiting the concept of the disease. Rheumatology, 273.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Rüegg S, Engelter S, Jeanneret C, Hetzel A, Probst A, Steck AJ, Lyrer P. (2003). Bilateral vertebral artery occlusion resulting from giant cell arteritis: report of 3 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore), 82(1):1-12.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Dejaco C, Ramiro S, Duftner C, Besson FL, Bley TA et al. (2018). EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis, 77:636-643.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Dasgupta B, Borg FA, Hassan N, Alexander L, Barraclough K, Bourke B, et al. (2010). BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology, 49:1594-1597.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Fraser JA, Weyand CM, Newman NJ, Biousse V. (2008). The Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis. Rev Neurol Dis, 5:140-152.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Prünte MKR, Naumann A, Christ M, Naumann M, Bayas A. (2023). Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement-baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort. Front Neurol, 14:1188073.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Larivière D, Sacre K, Klein I, Hyafil F, Choudat L, Chauveheid MP, Papo T. (2014). Extra- and intracranial cerebral vasculitis in giant cell arteritis: an observational study. Medicine (Baltimore), 93(28):e265.
Publisher | Google Scholor - De Silva M, Hazleman BL. (1986). Azathioprine in giant cell arteritis/polymyalgia rheumatica: a double-blind study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 45:136-138.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Alsolaimani RS, Bhavsar SV, Khalidi NA, Pagnoux C, Mandzia JL, Tay K, Barra LJ. (2016). Severe Intracranial Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: 5 Cases and Literature Review. J Rheumatol, 43(3):648-656.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Zenone T, Puget M. (2013). Characteristics of cerebrovascular accidents at time of diagnosis in a series of 98 patients with giant cell arteritis. Rheumatol Int, 33(12):3017-3023.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Coronel L, Rodríguez-Pardo J, Monjo I, de Miguel E. (2021) Prevalence and significance of ischemic cerebrovascular events in giant cell arteritis. Med Clin (Barc), 157(2):53-57.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Sanchez-Alvarez C, Hawkins AS, Koster MJ, Lehman VT, Crowson CS, Warrington KJ. (2020). Clinical and Radiographic Features of Giant Cell Arteritis With Intracranial Involvement. ACR Open Rheumatol, 471-477.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Grossman C, Barshack I, Koren-Morag N, Ben-Zvi I, Bornstein G. (2017). Risk factors for severe cranial ischaemic events in patients with giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 35 Suppl 103(1):88-93.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Salvarani C, Della Bella C, Cimino L, Macchioni P, Formisano D, Bajocchi G, Pipitone N, Catanoso MG, Restuccia G, Ghinoi A, Boiardi L. (2009). Risk factors for severe cranial ischaemic events in an Italian population-based cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford), 48(3):250-253.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Donaldson L, Nanji K, Rebello R, Khalidi NA, Rodriguez AR. (2020). Involvement of the intracranial circulation in giant cell arteritis. Can J Ophthalmol, 55(5):391-400.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Soriano A, Muratore F, Pipitone N, Boiardi L, Cimino L, Salvarani C. (2017). Visual loss and other cranial ischaemic complications in giant cell arteritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 13(8):476-484.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Hočevar A, Ješe R, Tomšič M, Rotar Ž. (2020). Risk factors for severe cranial ischaemic complications in giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 59(10):2953-2959.
Publisher | Google Scholor - González-Gay MA, Blanco R, Rodríguez-Valverde V, Martínez-Taboada VM, Delgado-Rodriguez et al. (1998). Permanent visual loss and cerebrovascular accidents in giant cell arteritis: predictors and response to treatment. Permanent visual loss and cerebrovascular accidents in giant cell arteritis: predictors and response to treatment. Arthritis Rheum, 41(8):1497-504
Publisher | Google Scholor - Borg FA, Salter VLJ, Dasgupta B. (2008). Neuro-ophthalmic complications in giant cell arteritis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, 8(4):323-330.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Oerding C, Kaden I, Wohlfarth K. (2020). Isolated Bilateral Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis and Recurrent Ischemic Strokes in a Patient with Suspected Giant Cell Arteritis. Case Rep Neurol, 12(1):84-91.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Zarar A, Zafar TT, Khan AA, Suri MF, Qureshi AI. (2014). Internal carotid artery stenosis associated with giant cell arteritis: case report and discussion. J Vasc Interv Neurol, 7(5):24-27.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Lu-Emerson C, Walker M, Huber BR, Ghodke B, Longstreth WT Jr, Khot SP. (2010). Lethal giant cell arteritis with multiple ischemic strokes despite aggressive immunosuppressive therapy. J Neurol Sci, 295(1-2):120-124.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Conticini E, Falsetti P, Bardelli M, Cantarini L, Frediani B. (2021). Giant cell arteritis presenting as a stroke in the internal carotid artery territory: a case-based review. Reumatologia, 59(2):121-125.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Cox BC, Fulgham JR, Klaas JP. (2019). Recurrent Stroke in Giant Cell Arteritis Despite Immunotherapy. Neurologist, 24(4):139-141.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Paroli M, Caccavale R, Accapezzato D. (2024). Giant Cell Arteritis: Advances in Understanding Pathogenesis and Implications for Clinical Practice. Cells, 13(3):267.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Solans-Laqué R, Bosch-Gil JA, Molina-Catenario CA, Ortega-Aznar A, Alvarez-Sabin J, et al. (2008). Stroke and multi-infarct dementia as presenting symptoms of giant cell arteritis: report of 7 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore), 87(6):335-344.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Mineji K, Yako R, Toki N, Tomobuchi M, Nakao N. (2023). Giant cell arteritis with severe intracranial involvement diagnosed and treated early. Surg Neurol Int, 14:332.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Shigeyasu M, Sasaki N, Nishino S, Sakai N. (2022). Giant cell arteritis with simultaneous onset of multiple intracranial vascular occlusions: A case report. Surg Neurol Int, 13:21.
Publisher | Google Scholor