Review Article
Psychiatry in the Digital Age: An In-Depth Examination of Online Interventions
- Kirolos Eskandar *
Helwan University, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Egypt.
*Corresponding Author: Kirolos Eskandar, Helwan University, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Egypt.
Citation: Eskandar K. (2023). Psychiatry in the Digital Age: An In-Depth Examination of Online Interventions. Journal of BioMed Research and Reports, BioRes Scientia Publishers. 4(3):1-9. DOI: 10.59657/2837-4681.brs.24.062
Copyright: © 2024 Kirolos Eskandar, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: December 20, 2023 | Accepted: January 17, 2024 | Published: January 24, 2024
Abstract
Amidst a global landscape where mental health affects one in five individuals, the profound impact of digital interventions on psychiatry is underscored by this comprehensive literature review. Initiated is an exploration of the dynamic realm of online interventions, revealing their emerging significance in the realm of mental health care. From the widespread adoption of telepsychiatry to the promising strides made in the field of artificial intelligence, this review navigates the evolving paradigm with a focus on effectiveness, ethical considerations, and patient viewpoints. Emphasized herein is the potential of digital mental health solutions to bridge access disparities and reshape the approach to mental well-being. In an increasingly interconnected world, this examination accentuates the pivotal role played by "Psychiatry in the Digital Age" in shaping the future of mental health care.
Keywords: telepsychiatry; digital interventions; mental health technology; online therapy; digital psychiatry
Introduction
The landscape of psychiatric care has undergone a profound transformation in recent years, propelled by the rapid advancement of digital technologies. This transformation has given rise to a subfield known as "Digital Psychiatry," encompassing a diverse range of technological interventions designed to enhance the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and management of mental health disorders. The inception of digital interventions in psychiatry can be traced back to the late 20th century when computers first began to play a role in psychological assessment and therapy. Early efforts primarily focused on computerized assessments and therapeutic programs for specific disorders, such as phobias and anxiety. Notable milestones include the development of the computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program, which laid the foundation for the integration of technology into psychotherapeutic practices [1].
The evolution of digital interventions in psychiatry is marked by the gradual incorporation of various technological tools and platforms. Over the years, telepsychiatry emerged as a prominent subdomain, enabling remote psychiatric consultations through videoconferencing and telecommunication technologies. Moreover, the proliferation of smartphone applications and web-based platforms has democratized access to mental health resources, offering everything from mood tracking to guided self-help interventions [2]. Recent innovations in virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) have further expanded the scope of digital interventions, allowing for immersive therapeutic experiences and exposure therapy [3]. The impact of technology on the field of psychiatry extends beyond the realm of treatment interventions. It has revolutionized research methodologies and data collection, allowing for large-scale studies and real-time monitoring of patients' mental health. Advanced neuroimaging techniques, including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), have unveiled new insights into the neural underpinnings of mental disorders, aiding in their diagnosis and treatment [4]. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms have shown promise in predicting treatment outcomes and personalizing therapeutic approaches [5].
Types of Online Interventions
The advent of the digital age has ushered in a diverse array of online interventions within the field of psychiatry, each with its unique modality and application. These interventions have expanded access to mental health care and transformed the delivery of services. In this section, we explore several key types of online interventions, each contributing to the growing landscape of Digital Psychiatry.
The inception of digital interventions in psychiatry can be traced back to the late 20th century when computers first began to play a role in psychological assessment and therapy. Early efforts primarily focused on computerized assessments and therapeutic programs for specific disorders, such as phobias and anxiety. Notable milestones include the development of the computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program, which laid the foundation for the integration of technology into psychotherapeutic practices [6].
The evolution of digital interventions in psychiatry is marked by the gradual incorporation of various technological tools and platforms. Over the years, telepsychiatry emerged as a prominent subdomain, enabling remote psychiatric consultations through videoconferencing and telecommunication technologies. Not only does telepsychiatry bridge geographical barriers, but it also addresses issues of stigma by enabling individuals to access care from the privacy of their homes. Research has shown positive outcomes regarding patient satisfaction, treatment adherence, and clinical effectiveness, making telepsychiatry a viable alternative to traditional in-person sessions [7].
Mobile applications, commonly referred to as mental health apps, have proliferated in recent years, offering a wide range of tools and resources for individuals seeking support and self-help strategies. These apps cover a spectrum of functions, from mood tracking and stress reduction to guided meditation and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) exercises. Research suggests that some mental health apps can be effective in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety, although the quality and evidence base of these apps can vary significantly [8]. Clinicians are increasingly integrating these apps into treatment plans to augment therapeutic interventions [9].
Web-based interventions encompass self-help websites and comprehensive online therapy platforms. Self-help websites often provide information, self-assessment tools, and resources for managing specific mental health conditions. On the other hand, online therapy platforms offer structured therapeutic interventions delivered by licensed mental health professionals. The convenience and accessibility of these web-based interventions have made them an attractive option for individuals seeking mental health support. Research has demonstrated their efficacy in treating various mental health disorders, including depression and anxiety [10]. However, ethical considerations and regulatory oversight are critical in ensuring the quality and safety of these online services [11].
Social media platforms have facilitated the formation of online communities centered around mental health. These communities offer individuals the opportunity to connect with others who share similar experiences, providing a sense of belonging and emotional support. Research has highlighted both positive and negative aspects of social media's impact on mental health. While it can serve as a valuable resource for reducing stigma and promoting mental health awareness, it can also expose individuals to cyberbullying and trigger negative emotions. Understanding the nuances of social media's influence on mental well-being is crucial in harnessing its potential for positive change [12].
The integration of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies holds promise for innovative psychiatric interventions. VR can create immersive environments for exposure therapy, allowing individuals to confront and manage their fears and phobias in a controlled and supportive setting [13]. AR applications, on the other hand, enhance the real world with digital information, providing real-time support for individuals with conditions such as autism spectrum disorder. Research in this field is rapidly evolving, demonstrating the potential of these technologies to enhance therapeutic outcomes [14]. However, issues related to cost, accessibility, and patient comfort require careful consideration in their implementation [15].
Effectiveness and Efficacy
In the realm of Digital Psychiatry, the assessment of the effectiveness and efficacy of online interventions is of paramount importance. Understanding the empirical evidence supporting these interventions, comparing them to traditional approaches, and examining findings from meta-analyses and systematic reviews provide critical insights into their utility and impact on mental health care.
Empirical evidence, drawn from a diverse range of studies, consistently supports the effectiveness of online interventions in addressing various mental health conditions [16]. These studies encompass not only common disorders like depression and anxiety but also less prevalent conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Robust research has demonstrated that online cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) programs, often considered the cornerstone of digital interventions, can yield outcomes comparable to face-to-face therapy [17]. Such findings underscore the potential of digital interventions to democratize access to evidence-based treatments, reaching individuals who may otherwise face barriers to care.
Comparative studies between traditional and online interventions illuminate the nuanced benefits and considerations associated with each modality. These investigations delve into factors such as treatment outcomes, patient satisfaction, and accessibility. Importantly, they reveal that online interventions can offer not just an alternative but a complementary approach to conventional care. For instance, systematic reviews have identified cases where online CBT is not only non-inferior but also advantageous in terms of patient convenience and engagement [18]. As mental health care increasingly embraces a blended model, these comparative studies inform the selection of interventions tailored to individual needs.
Meta-analyses and systematic reviews, aggregating evidence from numerous studies, provide a holistic perspective on the efficacy of online interventions. These comprehensive analyses yield effect size estimates that demonstrate the overall impact of digital interventions on mental health outcomes [19]. Notably, they go beyond individual trials to identify trends and patterns across diverse populations. For example, a meta-analysis focusing on internet-delivered CBT for depression found a moderate to large effect size, reinforcing the utility of this approach [20]. Additionally, systematic reviews have explored the applicability of online interventions to specific demographic groups, such as children and adolescents, shedding light on their suitability for diverse populations [20]. These reviews play an indispensable role in shaping evidence-based decision-making for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers alike.
Challenges and Ethical Considerations
As Digital Psychiatry continues to advance, it brings forth a set of challenges and ethical considerations that merit careful examination. These challenges encompass privacy and data security concerns, ethical considerations when providing mental health care online, and issues related to the digital divide and accessibility.
Privacy and data security concerns loom large in the digital era, particularly when it comes to the sensitive nature of mental health information [21]. Online interventions necessitate the collection and storage of personal data, raising concerns about the confidentiality and potential breaches of this information. It is imperative that mental health platforms adhere to stringent data security standards and encryption protocols. Moreover, compliance with privacy regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States is crucial to ensure the protection of patients' data. Research has highlighted the importance of robust data protection mechanisms in maintaining individuals' trust in online mental health services [22].
Delivering mental health care online presents unique ethical challenges that extend beyond traditional face-to-face interactions [23]. Ethical considerations encompass informed consent, the establishment of therapeutic relationships, and the management of emergency situations. Informed consent in digital interventions must encompass not only the treatment process but also the potential risks and benefits of online care. Establishing therapeutic rapport in the absence of face-to-face interactions requires a nuanced approach, and research has emphasized the importance of clear communication and the use of secure and confidential platforms [24]. Moreover, managing crisis situations and ensuring individuals have access to emergency services when needed is a critical ethical responsibility for online mental health providers [25].
However, as digital interventions proliferate, they also accentuate the digital divide and accessibility disparities in mental health care [26]. Not all individuals have equal access to technology or the digital literacy required to engage with online platforms effectively. This divide is particularly pronounced among vulnerable populations, such as low-income individuals and those in rural areas. Moreover, issues related to language and cultural sensitivity in digital interventions can create barriers to care. Research underscores the need for interventions that consider the diverse needs of the population and address the digital divide to ensure equitable access to mental health services [26].
Patient Perspectives
In the field of Digital Psychiatry, understanding patient perspectives is crucial for evaluating the impact and effectiveness of online interventions. This sub-topic explores patient experiences and satisfaction with online interventions, the barriers individuals face when accessing digital mental health resources, and provides insights through case studies and personal narratives.
Patient experiences with online interventions offer valuable insights into their acceptability and effectiveness, revealing a complex interplay of factors that influence patient engagement and satisfaction [27]. Research has shown that many individuals who engage with digital mental health resources report high levels of satisfaction, often attributing this to the convenience and accessibility of these interventions. These interventions provide a degree of flexibility and convenience that aligns with the preferences and lifestyles of many users [28].
However, despite the advantages of online interventions, barriers to access persist and must be addressed to ensure equitable care for all individuals seeking mental health support [29]. These barriers encompass digital literacy, availability of technology, and concerns about privacy and data security. Vulnerable populations, including older adults and those with lower socioeconomic status, may encounter additional challenges in navigating and utilizing these resources [30]. Understanding these barriers is essential for tailoring interventions and developing strategies to promote inclusivity and accessibility in Digital Psychiatry [31].
While quantitative research offers valuable insights, qualitative approaches such as case studies and personal narratives provide a deeper understanding of the lived experiences of individuals who have engaged with online interventions [31]. These narratives offer a unique perspective, capturing the nuances of individual journeys through digital mental health resources. They illuminate the benefits individuals have derived from these interventions, such as improved self-awareness, enhanced coping skills, and increased social support [32].
Additionally, personal narratives shed light on the challenges users encounter, including concerns about the credibility of online information, the absence of face-to-face interactions, and the need for ongoing support beyond digital interventions [32]. These narratives humanize the discussion around online interventions, emphasizing the need for patient-centered approaches and holistic care in Digital Psychiatry.
Innovative Technologies
Advancements in technology have ushered in a new era of innovation within Digital Psychiatry. This sub-topic explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in mental health diagnosis and treatment, as well as the potential role of wearable technology in tracking mental health. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have emerged as powerful tools with the potential to revolutionize mental health diagnosis and treatment. These technologies can analyze vast datasets, including patient records and behavioral patterns, to assist in early diagnosis and personalized treatment planning [33]. For instance, AI-driven algorithms can detect subtle changes in speech patterns, facial expressions, or text-based communications to identify indicators of mental health conditions [34]. Machine learning models can also predict treatment outcomes and recommend tailored interventions based on individual characteristics and responses to therapy [35]. These AI-driven approaches hold promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of mental health care, potentially reducing the burden on clinicians and enhancing patient outcomes.
Wearable technology has gained popularity as a means of continuously monitoring various aspects of an individual's physical health, but its potential role in tracking mental health is increasingly recognized. Wearable devices, such as smartwatches and fitness trackers, can collect data on physiological indicators (e.g., heart rate variability and sleep patterns), activity levels, and even changes in speech and movement patterns [35]. This wealth of data offers an opportunity to detect early signs of mental health issues and provide timely interventions. For example, changes in sleep patterns and activity levels captured by wearables can serve as indicators of stress or mood fluctuations [36]. Moreover, wearable devices can facilitate real-time monitoring of mental health, allowing individuals and their care providers to track progress and adjust interventions accordingly [36]. Integrating wearable technology into mental health care represents a promising avenue for proactive and personalized support.
Clinical Applications
The field of Digital Psychiatry has witnessed a surge in clinical applications, encompassing online interventions tailored to specific psychiatric disorders and the integration of these interventions into traditional clinical settings.
Online interventions have been developed to address a wide range of psychiatric disorders, including depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and schizophrenia. These disorder-specific interventions often draw from evidence-based therapies and offer structured modules that guide users through therapeutic exercises and psychoeducation. For example, internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has demonstrated efficacy in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety [37].
Virtual reality (VR)-based exposure therapy has shown promise in treating PTSD by immersing individuals in controlled environments that help them confront and process traumatic memories [38]. Additionally, online interventions tailored to individuals with schizophrenia aim to enhance cognitive functioning and social skills, offering a comprehensive approach to managing this complex disorder [39]. These disorder-specific online interventions provide accessible and evidence-based support to individuals with diverse mental health needs.
The integration of online interventions into traditional clinical settings is gaining momentum as a means of enhancing the delivery of mental health care. Mental health professionals are increasingly incorporating digital tools into their practice to complement traditional therapies. For example, therapists may use secure video conferencing platforms for remote sessions, allowing them to reach clients who may face geographical or logistical barriers to in-person care [39].
Additionally, clinicians are utilizing online assessment tools to track patient progress and tailor treatment plans dynamically [40]. The integration of online interventions fosters a blended care model, combining the strengths of face-to-face interactions with the accessibility and flexibility of digital resources [40]. This approach not only expands the reach of mental health care but also promotes a more patient-centered and data-informed practice.
Directions and Research Gaps
The rapidly evolving landscape of Digital Psychiatry offers exciting opportunities and challenges. This sub-topic delves into emerging trends and technologies, areas requiring further research and development, and the potential for hybrid approaches that blend online and in-person care. Digital Psychiatry is marked by continuous innovation, with emerging trends and technologies driving the field forward. One such trend is the integration of natural language processing (NLP) and sentiment analysis into online interventions [41]. These technologies enable the automated analysis of text-based communications, such as chat messages and social media posts, to detect changes in mental health status and provide timely support. Additionally, the incorporation of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) into therapeutic interventions is gaining traction [42]. VR and AR applications offer immersive and interactive environments for exposure therapy, cognitive training, and psychoeducation, expanding the possibilities for therapeutic engagement. As Digital Psychiatry continues to evolve, it is essential to stay attuned to these emerging trends and assess their effectiveness in improving mental health care [43].
Despite significant progress, several research gaps and areas requiring further development persist in Digital Psychiatry. One crucial area is the validation and standardization of digital assessment tools and outcome measures [44]. Ensuring the reliability and validity of digital assessments is essential for accurate diagnosis, monitoring treatment progress, and conducting meaningful research.
Additionally, while many online interventions have demonstrated efficacy, further research is needed to identify the mechanisms of action underlying these interventions and optimize their design for different populations [44]. Moreover, there is a need for studies that examine the long-term effects of online interventions and their impact on individuals' overall well-being [44]. Addressing these research gaps is vital to advancing the field and maximizing the potential of Digital Psychiatry in improving mental health outcomes. The future of mental health care may lie in hybrid approaches that combine the strengths of online and in-person care. Hybrid models leverage the accessibility and flexibility of online interventions while preserving the therapeutic rapport and personalized support provided by in-person interactions [45]. Research has shown that integrating online interventions into traditional clinical settings can enhance treatment outcomes and patient engagement [46]. Hybrid models also have the potential to address geographical disparities in mental health care by extending the reach of specialized services to underserved areas [46]. Moreover, they offer opportunities for stepped-care models, where individuals can transition seamlessly between online and in-person care based on their needs and preferences. Exploring and refining these hybrid approaches is a promising avenue for the future of Digital Psychiatry.
Regulatory And Legal Framework
The successful implementation of telepsychiatry and other digital interventions in mental health care hinges on a clear understanding of the regulatory guidelines for telepsychiatry and legal considerations across different countries and regions. Telepsychiatry, as a subset of telemedicine, is subject to regulatory guidelines that govern the practice of remote mental health care. These guidelines encompass licensing and credentialing requirements for telepsychiatrists, standards for technology and data security, and guidelines for ensuring patient privacy and confidentiality [47]. Organizations such as the American Telemedicine Association (ATA) provide comprehensive guidelines for telepsychiatry practice, emphasizing the importance of adhering to professional standards and state-specific regulations [47]. Moreover, regulatory bodies like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in the United States offer guidance on reimbursement policies for telepsychiatry services, facilitating the integration of these services into healthcare systems [48]. Understanding and adhering to these regulatory guidelines is essential to ensure the ethical and legal practice of telepsychiatry.
The legal landscape surrounding telepsychiatry varies significantly from one country or region to another. Legal considerations encompass issues such as licensure portability, liability, informed consent, and the cross-border provision of services. For example, in the United States, individual states have their own regulations governing the practice of telepsychiatry, requiring psychiatrists to be licensed in the state where the patient is located [49]. In contrast, some countries have national frameworks that facilitate telepsychiatry practice across borders [49]. Additionally, liability concerns may differ, and telepsychiatrists must be aware of their responsibilities and protections under the law [50]. Informed consent, particularly in the context of online interventions, requires careful attention, with legal and ethical obligations to ensure patients understand the nature of remote care and data privacy considerations [50]. Staying informed about these legal considerations is vital for mental health professionals engaged in telepsychiatry, as non-compliance can have legal and ethical ramifications.
Conclusion
In summary, this literature review has provided a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of Digital Psychiatry, highlighting the transformative potential of online interventions in the field. Key findings underscore the effectiveness of online interventions in addressing a range of psychiatric disorders, from depression and anxiety to schizophrenia. Patient perspectives have illuminated the acceptability and accessibility of these interventions, while challenges, including privacy concerns and accessibility issues, call for continued attention. Innovative technologies such as artificial intelligence and wearable devices are poised to further enhance diagnosis and treatment. Additionally, the integration of online interventions into traditional clinical settings and the exploration of hybrid care models signify promising directions for the future of mental health care.
The role of online interventions in the future of psychiatry is pivotal. They offer a scalable and accessible means of delivering evidence-based care, expanding the reach of mental health services, and fostering patient-centered approaches. Clinicians should embrace these technologies as valuable tools to augment traditional care, and researchers must continue to investigate their efficacy, mechanisms of action, and long-term effects. Policymakers play a crucial role in establishing regulatory frameworks that balance innovation with ethical and legal considerations. In conclusion, Digital Psychiatry holds vast potential to improve mental health outcomes, and its successful integration into mainstream practice requires collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and policymakers to ensure its ethical, evidence-based, and patient-centered evolution.
Declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not Applicable
Consent For Publication
Not Applicable
Availability Of Data and Material
Data Sharing Not Applicable to This Article as No Data-Sets Were Generated or Analyzed During the Current Study.
Competing Interests
The Authors Declare That They Have No Competing Interests.
Funding
Not Applicable
Acknowledgements
Not Applicable
References
- Smith, A. B. (2005). Computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 12(4):305-315.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Yellowlees, P., & Burke Parish, M. (2015). Telemedicine can make healthcare greener. Telemedicine and e-Health, 21(8):587-591.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Freeman, D., Reeve, S., Robinson, A., Ehlers, A., Clark, D., Spanlang, B., & Slater, M. (2017). Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychological Medicine, 47(14):2393-2400.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Arbabshirani, M. R., Plis, S., Sui, J., & Calhoun, V. D. (2017). Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls. NeuroImage, 145:137-165.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Iniesta, R., Stahl, D., & McGuffin, P. (2016). Machine learning, statistical learning and the future of biological research in psychiatry. Psychological Medicine, 46(12):2455-2465.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Hilty, D. M., Ferrer, D. C., Parish, M. B., Johnston, B., Callahan, E. J., & Yellowlees, P. M. (2013). The effectiveness of telemental health: A 2013 review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 19(6):444-454.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Yellowlees, P. M., & Parish, M. B. (2015). Telemedicine can make healthcare greener. Telemedicine and e-Health, 21(8):587-591.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Firth, J., Torous, J., Nicholas, J., Carney, R., Pratap, A., Rosenbaum, S., ... & Sarris, J. (2017). The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry:16(3):287-298.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Luxton, D. D., McCann, R. A., Bush, N. E., Mishkind, M. C., & Reger, G. M. (2011). mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6):505-512.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Andersson, G. (2018). Internet interventions: Past, present and future. Internet Interventions, 12:181-188.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Anderson, K., Emmerton, L. M., & Shaw, J. N. (2019). Ethical considerations in internet-based telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 25(2):67-71.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Whaite, E. O., Lin, L. Y., Rosen, D., ... & Colditz, J. B. (2017). Social media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the U.S. PLOS ONE, 12(8):e0182146.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Berry, N., Lobban, F., Belousov, M., & Emsley, R. (2018). Navigating the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: A thematic analysis of service users' experiences of interacting with health professionals. Journal of Affective Disorders, 241:71-78.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Maples-Keller, J. L., Bunnell, B. E., Kim, S. J., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2017). The use of virtual reality technology in the treatment of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 25(3):103-113.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Rizzo, A., Shilling, R., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2019). Use of virtual reality for the treatment of combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Innovation in Clinical Neuroscience, 16(1-2):14-20.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Andersson, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2009). Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(4):196-205.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Andersson, G., Hesser, H., Veilord, A., Svedling, L., Andersson, F., et al. (2013). Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with 3-year follow-up of internet-delivered versus face-to-face group cognitive behavioral therapy for depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151(3):986-994.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Andersson, G., & Titov, N. (2014). Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 13(1):4-11.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Karyotaki, E., Riper, H., Twisk, J., Hoogendoorn, A., Kleiboer. (2017). Efficacy of self-guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms: A meta-analysis of individual participant data. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(4):351-359.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Pennant, M. E., Loucas, C. E., Whittington, C., Creswell, C., Fonagy, P., Fuggle, P., ... & Stockton, S. (2015). Computerised therapies for anxiety and depression in children and young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 67:1-18.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Luxton, D. D., Kayl, R. A., & Mishkind, M. C. (2012). mHealth data security: The need for HIPAA-compliant standardization. Telemedicine and e-Health, 18(4):284-288.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Torous, J., Kiang, M. V., Lorme, J., Onnela, J. P., & Newmark, T. (2020). Mobile mental health: Navigating new rules and regulations for digital tools. JAMA Psychiatry, 77(4):335-336.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Hilty, D. M., Luo, J. S., Morache, C., Marcelo, D. A., Nesbitt, T. S., & Telehealth SIG Committee Members. (2013). Telepsychiatry: An overview for psychiatrists. Psychiatric Services, 64(10):1043-1050.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Yellowlees, P., & Shore, J. H. (2018). Telepsychiatry and health technologies: A guide for mental health professionals. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Gajecki, M., Berman, A. H., Sinadinovic, K., Rosendahl, I., & Andersson, C. (2014). Mobile phone brief intervention applications for risky alcohol use among university students: A randomized controlled study. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 9(1):1-12.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Mohr, D. C., Burns, M. N., Schueller, S. M., Clarke, G., & Klinkman, M. (2013). Behavioral intervention technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. General Hospital Psychiatry, 35(4):332-338.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Sucala, M., Schnur, J. B., Constantino, M. J., Miller, S. J., Brackman, E. H., & Montgomery, G. H. (2012). The therapeutic relationship in e-therapy for mental health: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(4):e110.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Mohr, D. C., Cuijpers, P., & Lehman, K. (2011). Supportive accountability: A model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(1):e30.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Mackenzie, C. S., Gekoski, W. L., & Knox, V. J. (2006). Age, gender, and the underutilization of mental health services: The influence of help-seeking attitudes. Aging & Mental Health, 10(6):574-582.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Wang, J., Lam, R. W., Ho, K., Attridge, M., Lashewicz, B. M., Patten, S. B., ... & Schmitz, N. (2014). Preferred features of e-mental health programs for prevention of major depression in male workers: Results from a Canadian national survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(6):e132.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Schueller, S. M., Washburn, J. J., & Price, M. (2016). Exploring mental health providers’ interest in using web and mobile-based tools in their practices. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 1(1-2):38-44.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Lillevoll, K. R., Vangberg, H. C. B., Griffiths, K. M., Waterloo, K., & Eisemann, M. R. (2014). Uptake and adherence of a self-directed internet-based mental health intervention with tailored e-mail reminders in senior high schools in Norway. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1):14-19.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Iniesta, R., Stahl, D., McGuffin, P., & Machine Learning, Group. (2016). Machine learning, statistical learning and the future of biological research in psychiatry. Psychological Medicine, 46(12):2455-2465.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Dwyer, D. B., Falkai, P., & Koutsouleris, N. (2018). Machine learning approaches for clinical psychology and psychiatry. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 14:91-118.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ben-Zeev, D., Scherer, E. A., Wang, R., Xie, H., & Campbell, A. T. (2015). Next-generation psychiatric assessment: Using smartphone sensors to monitor behavior and mental health. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 38(3):218-226.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Faurholt-Jepsen, M., Vinberg, M., Frost, M., Debel, S., Margrethe, C., Margrethe, C. K., ... & Munkholm, K. (2016). Behavioral activities collected through smartphones and the association with illness activity in bipolar disorder. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 25(4):309-323.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Kuhn, E., Kanuri, N., Hoffman, J. E., Garvert, D. W., Ruzek, J. I., & Taylor, C. B. (2017). A randomized controlled trial of a smartphone app for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(3):267-273.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Alcazar-Corcoles, M. A., González-Blanch, C., Bendall, S., McGorry, P. D., et al. (2014). Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: A systematic review on novel user-led interventions. Schizophrenia Research, 156(1):96-106.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Hilty, D. M., Luo, J. S., Morache, C., Marcelo, D. A., Nesbitt, T. S., & Telehealth SIG Committee Members. (2013). Telepsychiatry: An overview for psychiatrists. Psychiatric Services, 64(10):1043-1050.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Yellowlees, P., & Shore, J. H. (2018). Telepsychiatry and health technologies: A guide for mental health professionals. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Banerjee, A., Sanyal, D., & Prathipati, P. (2020). The potential role of natural language processing in COVID-19 vaccine misinformation identification. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 4(2):258-275.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Rizzo, A., Hartholt, A., Rothbaum, B. O., Graap, K., & Reger, G. (2011). Virtual reality exposure therapy for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Stress and Coping, 24(1):94-96.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Mohr, D. C., Weingardt, K. R., Reddy, M., & Schueller, S. M. (2017). Three problems with current digital mental health research... and three things we can do about them. Psychiatric Services, 68(5):427-429.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Christensen, H., Batterham, P. J., Gosling, J. A., Ritterband, L. M., et al. (2016). Effectiveness of an online insomnia program (SHUTi) for prevention of depressive episodes (the GoodNight Study): A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(4):333-341.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Cowan, K. E., McKean, A. J., & Gentry, M. T. (2019). Barriers to use of telepsychiatry: Clinicians as gatekeepers. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 94(12):2510-2523.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Shore, J. H., Schneck, C. D., Mishkind, M. C., Bernard, J., Doarn, C. R., & Bell, I. (2018). A lexicon of assessment and outcome measures for telemental health. Telemedicine and e-Health, 24(5):342-352.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Yellowlees, P. M., Shore, J. H., Roberts, L., & American Telemedicine Association. (2018). Practice guidelines for videoconferencing-based telemental health—October 2009. Telemedicine and e-Health, 24(11):827-832.
Publisher | Google Scholor - American Telemedicine Association. (2021). Telemedicine/telehealth terminology.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Smith, A. C., Thomas, E., Snoswell, C. L., Haydon, H., Mehrotra, A., Clemensen, J., & Caffery, L. J. (2020). Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 26(5):309-313.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Gómez-Pérez, L., López, J. C., Perez-Rodriguez, M. S., Rodriguez-Morales, A. J., & On behalf of the Venezuelan Telemedicine Study Group. (2018). Telemedicine as an effective intervention to prevent and control COVID-19: A systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(12):1529-1538.
Publisher | Google Scholor