Review Article
Potential Use of Propolis as Endodontic Irrigant
1Dean of Research and Graduate Studies, University Center FUNVIC, Pindamonhangaba-SP, Brazil.
2Dentistry student, University Center FUNVIC, Pindamonhangaba-SP, Pindamonhangaba-SP, Brazil.
*Corresponding Author: Claudemir De Carvalho, Dean of Research and Graduate Studies, University Center FUNVIC, Pindamonhangaba-SP, Brazil.
Citation: Claudemir C, Elizandra M. L, Ana P. S. Moraes, Kele P. S. (2023). Potential Use of Propolis as Endodontic Irrigant. Dentistry and Oral Health Care, BRS Publishers 2(2); DOI: 10.59657/2993-0863.brs.23.010
Copyright: © 2023 Claudemir de Carvalho, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: July 10, 2023 | Accepted: July 24, 2023 | Published: July 31, 2023
Abstract
Objective of this work was to review the use of propolis as an endodontic irrigant. For this, keywords were searched in the PubMed database, from April to October 2022. There are many chemical compounds in propolis from different geographic regions; Flavonoids are one of the most important agents that have anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, anti-allergic, anti-cancer, anti-bacterial and antioxidant effects. According to the mentioned properties, propolis can be used as a canal irrigation solution, as well as intracanal medicine in endodontic treatments. The results described in the literature are practically unanimous in showing the antibacterial and antifungal effects of different propolis extracts at different concentrations. In addition to flavonoids, other components of propolis such as resin, pollen, vitamins and phenols, indicate that propolis can be used not only as an intracanal irrigation solution, but for various purposes, with a promising role in endodontics as well as dentistry.
Keywords: propolis and endodontics; propolis and endodontic irrigants; propolis and root canal irrigant; propolis as intracanal medicament
Introduction
In endodontics, the objective of biomechanical preparation is to perform cleaning and disinfection of the root canal system (RCS) [1]. The presence of microorganisms in the root canal system is the main cause of endodontic infections and their viability depends on the redox potential, the availability of nutrients and the host's defense system. The identification of the predominant microorganisms in the infections makes it possible to adopt measures aimed at their elimination inside the canal. It is known that instrumentation, alone, does not guarantee the complete removal or inactivation of pathogens in infected canals, irrigation and medication are important, associating mechanical cleaning with the use of antibacterial agents, to improve the effectiveness of the treatment [2]. Irrigating solutions are used in endodontic treatment in order to eliminate bacteria from root canals. Several studies have been carried out in the search for irrigants that combine better properties, including antimicrobial activity, low or no toxicity to periapical tissues, solubility and ability to dissolve organic matter [3,4]. Intracanal medications are used as adjuvants in endodontic treatment, with the aim of moderating pain, reducing remaining bacteria and their metabolites, and accelerating the healing process [5]. In this context, propolis appears as an alternative of interest to complement treatment. Propolis is a resinous complex produced by the bees Apis mellifera L. whose variety of pharmacological properties results from the complexity of its composition [6,7,8]. It is composed of resin and balms (50-60%), pollen (5-10%), and other constituents such as amino acids, minerals, vitamins A and B complex, flavonoids, phenols, and aromatic compounds [9]. In general, propolis has been used as an anesthetic, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antioxidant, anticancer, antidiabetes, immunomodulator, tumoricide, among others. In dentistry, propolis has been used experimentally in the areas of endodontics, cariology, oral surgery, periodontics and oral pathology, among others [1,10]. Propolis extracts are commonly obtained from continuous immersion in various solvents, but there are other methods, including ultrasound and microwaves [11]. Because it is natural, non-toxic, low cost, does not cause microbial resistance and has a variety of therapeutic activities, propolis It is a product with good prospects for use in the dental field, including expansion of its field of applicability. There is evidence that it can be used as an alternative in the control and prevention of oral diseases. The results found in the literature are promising, so research involving propolis has been increasing both in quantity and complexity [12,13]. The present study aimed to review the literature about the potential use of propolis as an endodontic irrigant.
Methodology
From April to October 2022, a bibliographic search was carried out to locate articles published on the use of propolis as an endodontic irrigant. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed database using the following combinations of keywords: propolis and endodontics (124), propolis and endodontic irrigants (38), propolis and root canal irrigant (47) and propolis as intracanal medicament (32). Articles were included in full, published in English from the year 2000 onwards, describing in vitro or in vivo experiments showing the use of propolis as an intracanal irrigant.
Results
Among the 241 articles obtained, only specific full-length articles in English were used. Duplicate, non-specific articles that did not mention the pharmaceutical form and/or concentration of propolis used were excluded. Finally, 24 articles were included in the present study (Table 1).
Number of articles | Type of search | Pharmaceutical form / Concentration used | Conclusion |
24 | Experimental in vitro 20 Experimental in vivo 03 Meta-analysis–01 | Propolis extracts were used at different concentrations | It was possible to verify the effectiveness of propolis extracts used as irrigants due to their antibacterial and antifungal action. Propolis is more reliable in terms of toxicity. |
The information contained in the selected articles is summarized in Table 2.
RMGIC Resin-modified glass ionomer cements; HDPF Human dental pulp fibroblast.
Table 1: Number and characteristics of selected articles.
Reference | Type of Search | Pharmaceutical Form /Concentration Used | Conclusion |
Geraldini, et al. [14] 2000 | Experimental in vitro (teeth) | Propolis Ethanol Extract (PEE) 10%, 20% and 30% | The three concentrations were efficient for removing smear, promoting cleaning of the dental canal. |
Al-Qathami e Al-Madi [15] 2003 | Experimental in vitro (teeth) | Propolis solution 1:120 (500 mg of propolis dissolved in 120 mL of destilled water) | Propolis extract significantly reduced contamination of dental canals |
Oncag et al. [16] 2006 | Experimental in vitro (teeth) | Aqueous extract of propolis (Does not mention the concentration) | Propolis had good in vitro activity against E. faecalis in dental canals |
Ferreira et al. [17] 2007 | Experimental in vitro | Propolis Ethanol Extract (PEE) 10% | PEE proved to be effective against Prevotella nigrescens, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Actinomyces israelii, Clostridium perfringens, Enterococcus faecalis |
Maia Filho et al. [3] 2008 | Experimental in vitro (teeth) | Propolis extract (1g/mL) in dilutions1:10, 1:20, 1:40, 1:80 e 1:160. | Propolis extract at a 1:10 dilution (1mg/mL) showed good antimicrobial activity against E. faecalis, being greater than 5% sodium hypochlorite and less than chlorhexidine gel |
Rezende et al. [18] 2008 | Experimental in vivo | Propolis Ethanol Extract (PEE) 11% Aqueous extract of propolis 11% | The two extracts showed a zone of inhibition against microorganisms isolated from the root canal of the teeth. |
Awawdeh et al. [19] 2009 | Experimental in vitro (teeth) | Propolis extract (does not mention the concentration) | Propolis was more effective as an intracanal treatment in eliminating E. faecalis |
Kandaswamy et al. [20] 2010 | Experimental in vitro (teeth) | Green propolis extract in various concentrations | Propolis had good antibacterial activity against E. fecalis |
Carbajal Mejía [21] 2013 | Experimental in vitro (teeth) | Peruvian propolis extract (does not mention the concentration) | Propolis showed the same efficiency as 2% chorexedin for the control of E. fecalis and C. albicans in artificially contaminated dentinal canals |
Jolly et al. [22] 2013 | Experimental in vivo | Propolis dimethyl sulfoxide extract (DMSO) | Propolis showed a marked decrease in colony-forming units of aerobic and anaerobic endodontic bacteria. |
Tiagy et al. [23] 2013 | Experimental in vitro (teeth) | Green propolis ethanol extract 11% | Propolis had a marked antimicrobial action against C. albicans |
Maekawa et al.[24] 2013 | Experimental in vitro (teeth) | Propolis glycolic extract 12% | The extract used was eficiente against C. albicans, E. faecalis e E. coli in root canals |
Ehsani et al. [25]2013 | Experimental in vitro (diffusion test) | Propolis Ethanol Extract (PEE) 15 |
Discussion
Irrigation of the root canal system must be carried out simultaneously with instrumentation for the correct elimination of microorganisms through the antimicrobial action of the applied substances. These substances must have a potent antimicrobial action to combat the microbiota present in endodontic infections [1,3,5]. The antimicrobial action of propolis in relation to the oral microbiota has been demonstrated over the years [13,17,21,28,34]. Until the late 1990s and early 2000s, formocresol and its like were often used as intracanal drugs, but such chemicals used as bactericides have been shown to diffuse throughout the body from the root apex, resulting in cases of undesirable effects, including allergies. Furthermore, as these drugs are potent carcinogens, there is no indication for these chemicals in modern endodontic treatment. Today, biocompatibility and stability are essential properties for intracanal drugs.36 Propolis has been demonstrated as a bioactive, biocompatible and non-toxic product [27,30].
The gold standard irrigant is sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl), normally 2.5%, due to its strong antimicrobial action and its dissolution of organic tissue. Its effectiveness is proportional to the concentration used, however, the higher it is, the greater the toxic effect on the periapical tissues and the more serious the complications arising from contact with the periradicular tissues [37]. Noites et al. [38] and Borrin et al. [39] report the complications that may arise during the use of sodium hypochlorite in endodontic treatment. Depending on the concentration of the solution used, bruising, pain, damage to vital tissues such as ulceration, necrosis, inhibition of neutrophil migration, damage to endothelial and fibroblastic cells may occur. Teixeira et al. [40] and Böhle et al. [41] also reported toxic effects of 2.5% NaCl solution for fibroblasts. No reports of propolis-based irrigating solution toxicity were found. Dentistry has been carrying out several studies regarding natural products that have pharmacological activity, reduced toxicity and biocompatibility, so that they are more accessible to the population. The usual indications for these products are associated with the treatment of infections, inflammation, toothache, scarring processes, maintaining good oral health through natural products [42]. Propolis, being a natural product, of plant origin and non-toxic, does not cause tissue damage and has a wide range of therapeutic properties, allowing its use in toothpastes, rinses, varnishes and irrigants, being a good natural product for the therapy of the oral microbiota [1,42]. Propolis is a powerful natural product, resulting from the combination of numerous chemical assets such as fatty acids, alcohols, amino acids, vitamins and mineral salts, with flavonoids being the main components. Propolis is an efficient alternative for the treatment and prevention of several oral problems such as dental caries, mucositis and endodontic treatment, due to its therapeutic diversity, its low toxicity, low cost and proven applicability [43,44]. According to Pinto et al. [12], propolis has low innate toxicity because flavonoids, its main constituents, have very low toxicity. The chemical composition of propolis is very complex and its content varies greatly depending on location, climate, year and season [6]. Despite the popularity of propolis over time, it is not considered a conventional therapeutic agent due to restrictions to regulate chemical composition and biological activity [45]. This standardization is indispensable for acceptance in the health system. Under these circumstances, the characterization of different types of propolis, according to their plant origin and chemical profile, becomes necessary [46]. Prospective studies in intellectual property databases are important to increase market competitiveness and thus generate new products in different areas of research [8].
Conclusion
Propolis and its phenolic and flavonoid constituents have many therapeutic uses in dentistry and oral health. Wide therapeutic uses due to its antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties have been demonstrated in several in vitro and in vivo studies, as well as in human clinical trials. As intracanal irritants, the different extracts used, in different concentrations, proved to be effective against some of the main intracanal contaminants. However, there is a great need to standardize the content of phenolics and flavonoids in propolis to obtain the best therapeutic benefits in dentistry and oral health.
References
- Silva YO, Silva WO, Machado MEL, Alandia-Román CC, Paulo AO. (2018). O extrato de própolis no tratamento endodôntico. J Orof Invest, 5(1):19-28.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Siqueira AL, Dantas CG, Gomes MZ, Padilha FF, Albuquerque Júnior RLC, Cardoso JC. (2014). Estudo da ação antibacteriana do extrato hidroalcoolico de própolis vermelha sobre Enterococcus faecalis. Rev Odontol UNESP, 43(6):359-366.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Maia Filho EM, Maia CCR, Bastos ACSC, Novais TMG. (2008). Efeito antimicrobiano in vitro de diferentes medicações endodônticas e própolis sobre Enterococcus faecalis. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, Porto Alegre, 56(1):21-25.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Silva F, Francisco NLSG, Brun SC, Barbosa CCN, Soares LC. (2016). Atividade Antimicrobiana de Soluções Irrigadoras no Preparo Biomecânico de Canais Radiculares Frente a Enterococus Faecalis. Brazilian Journal of Surgery and Clinical Research-BJSCR, 15(1):34-38.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Melo MCS, Cavalcante LC, Oliveira LV, Carvalho CMRS. (2018). Avaliação da dissociação iônica do hidróxido de cálcio associado ao Aloe vera como veículo. Rev Odontol UNESP, 47(2):98-105.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Bankova V, Castro SL, Marcucci MC. (2000). Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie, 31(1):3-15.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Munstedt K, Bogdanov S. (2009). Bee products and their potential use in modern medicine. Journal of ApiProduct and ApiMedical Science, 1:57-63.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Carvalho Furtado Jr. JH, Valadas LAR, Mendonça KS; Oliveira Filho R, Diógenes Gadelha LMU, Fiallos NM, et al. (2018). Propolis and its Dental Applications: A Technological Prospection. Recent Patents on Biotechnology, 12(4):288-296.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Zabaiou N, Fouache A, Trousson A, Baron S, Zellagui A, Lahouel M, et al. (2017). Biological properties of propolis extracts: Something new from an ancient product. Chem Phys Lipids, 207:214-222.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Bruschi ML, Rosseto HC, de Francisco LMB, de Toledo L. de AS, Raphaela RR. (2017). Nanostructured propolis as therapeutic systems with antimicrobial activity. Nano-and microscale drug delivery systems: design and fabrication, 377-391.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Aga H, Shibuya T, Hamada S, Iritani S, Miyake T. (1999). Propolis extract with improved water Solubility.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Pinto L.M.A, Prado NRT, Carvalho LB. (2011). Propriedades, Usos e Aplicações da Própolis. Revista Eletrônica de Farmácia, 8(3):25.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Almeida DC, Barbosa DC, Jardim-Júnior IJ, Mendonça SMS. (2016). Própolis na Odontologia: Uma Abordagem de suas diversas Aplicabilidades Clínicas. Revista Fluminense de Odontologia, 22(46).
Publisher | Google Scholor - Geraldini CAC, Salgado EGC, Rode SM. (2000). Aplication of própolis solutions on dentinal surface: scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Journal of Dental Research, 79(5):1022-1022.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Al-Qathami H, Al-Madi E. (2003). Comparison of sodium hypochlorite, propolis and saline as root canal irrigants: A pilot study. Saudi Dental J, 5:100-102.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Oncag O, Cogulu D, Uzel A, Sorkun K. (2006). Efficacy of propolis as an intracanal Medicament against Enterococcus faecalis. Gen Dent, 54(5):319-322.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ferreira FB, Torres SA, Rosa OP, Ferreira CM, Garcia RB, Marcucci MC, et al. (2007). Antimicrobial effect of propolis and other substances against selected endodontic pathogens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 104:709–716.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Rezende GPdSR, Costa LRdRS, Pimenta FC, Baroni DA. (2008). In vitro antimicrobial activity of endodontic pastes with propolis extracts and calcium hydroxide: a preliminary study. Brazilian dental journal, 19(4):301-305.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Awawdeh L, AL-Beitawi M, Hammad M. (2009). Effectiveness of propolis and calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal medicament against Enterococcus faecalis: A laboratory study. Australian Endodontic Journal, 35(2):52-58.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Kandaswamy D, VenkateshBabu N, Gogulnath D, Kindo AJ. (2010). Dentinal tubule Disinfection with 2% chlorexidine gel, propolis, Morinda citrifolia juice, 2% povidine iodine and calcium hydroxide.Int Endod J, 43:419-423.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Carbajal Mejía JB. (2013). Antimicrobial effects of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine, and propolis on Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry, 4:1-7.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Jolly M, Singh N, Rathore M, Tandon S, Banerjee M. (2013). Propolis and commonly used intracanal irrigants. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial potential. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 37(3):243-249.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Tyagi SP, Sinha DJ, Garg P, Singh UP, Mishra CC, Nagpal R. (2013). Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of propolis, Morinda citrifolia, Azadirachta indica (Neem) and 5% sodium hypochloriteon Candida albicans biofilm formed on tooth substrate: An in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 16:532-535
Publisher | Google Scholor - Maekawa LE, Valera MC, Oliveira LD, Carvalho CAT, Camargo CHR, Jorge AOC. (2013). Effect of Zingiber officinale and propolis on microorganisms and endotoxins in root canals. J Appl Oral Sci. 21(1):25-31.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ehsani M, Amin Marashi M, Zabihi E, Issazadeh M, Khafri S. (2013). A Comparison between Antibacterial Activity of Propolis and Aloe vera on Enterococcus faecalis (an In Vitro Study). Int J Mol Cell Med. 2(3):110-116.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Verma MK, Pandey RK, Khanna R, Agarwal J. (2014). The antimicrobial effectiveness of 25% propolis extract in root canal irrigation of primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 32:120-124.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Lopez BG-C, de Lourenço CC, Alves DA, Machado D, Lancellotti M, Sawaya ACHF. (2015). Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity of red propolis: an alert for its safe use Journal of Applied Microbiology. 119:677-687.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Agrawal V, Kapoor S, Agrawal I. (2016). Critical Review on Eliminating Endodontic Dental Infections Using Herbal Products. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 14(2):1-12,
Publisher | Google Scholor - Jaiswal N, Sinha DJ, Singh UP, Singh K, Jandial UA, Goel S. (2017). Evaluation ofantibacterial efficacy of Chitosan, Chlorhexidine, Propolis and Sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 9(9):1066-1074.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Uğur Aydin Z, Akpinar KE, Hepokur C, Erdönmez D. (2018). Assessment of toxicity and oxidative DNA damage of sodium hypochlorite, chitosan and propolis on fibroblast cells. Braz. Oral Res, 32:119.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Matochek MHM, Tomaz PLS , Oliveira TS , Polassi MR , Alonso RCB, Scremin FM, et al. (2020). Influence of a propolis-based irrigant solution on gap formation and bond strength of posts bonded to root canal dentin using different resin cements. Dent Mater J,39(3):490-499.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Almadi K, Alkahtany M, Alamam Y, Alaql F, Alaqil A, Almutairi M, et al. (2020). Influence of Propolis, Ozone and Photodynamic therapy in in root canal disinfection onresin bond strength to radicular dentin, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Parolia A, Kumar H, Ramamurthy S, Madheswaran T, Davamani F, Pichika MR, et al. (2021). Effect of Propolis Nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm in the Root Canal. Molecules, 26:715.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Oliveira Neto NF, Bonvicini JFS, Souza GL, Santiago MB, Veneziani RCS, Ambrósio SR, et al. (2022). Antibacterial activity of Brazilian red propolis and in vitro evaluation of Free radical production. Arch Oral Biol. 143:105520. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2022.105520. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Aguiar YL, Amaral PAS, Pereira LC. (2021). Soluções irrigadoras utilizadas no preparo químico-mecânico do sistema de canais radiculares: uma revisão da literatura. Research, Society and Development, 10(13):399101321453.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Kawashima N, Wadachi R, Suda H. (2009). Root canal medicaments. International Dental Journal. 59(1):5-11.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Macedo OSM, Silveira JCF, Rangel LFGO, Silva CMSD. (2021). O uso do hipoclorito de Sódio (NaOCl) como solução irrigadora para o tratamento endodôntico. Revista Pró-UniverSUS. 12(2):43-47.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Noites R, Carvalho MF, Vaz IP. (2009). Complicações que podem surgir durante o Uso do Hipoclorito de Sódio no Tratamento Endodôntico. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial. 50(1):53-56.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Borrin O, Licks R, Travessas JAC, Vieira RR, Butze JP. (2020). Conduta frente à lesão por hipoclorito de sódio em terapia endodôntica: um relato de prontuário. Archives Of Health Investigation. 9(2):123-126.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Teixeira PA, Coelho MS, Kato AS, Fontana CE, Bueno CES, Pedro-Rocha DG. (2018). Cytotoxicity assessment of 1% peracetic acid, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA on FG11 and FG15 human fibroblasts. Acta Odontol. Latinoam. 31(1):11-15.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Böhle S, Röhner E, Zippelius T, Jacob B, Matziolis G, Rohe S. (2022). Cytotoxic effect of sodium hypochlorite (Lavanox 0.08%) and chlorhexidine gluconate (Irrisept 0.05%) on human osteoblasts. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 32:81-89.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Domingues JJ, Oliveira LTA, Costa MDMA, Silva LAM, Nascimento F, Dietrich Lia. (2021). Uso de fitoterápicos e demais componentes vegetais e minerais na fabricação de produtos odontológicos naturais: Revisão de literatura. Research, Society and Development, 10(3):57610313678.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Machado AC, Freitas A, Sales-Peres SHC. (2016). Atividade anti-inflamatória de produtos naturais em odontologia: uma revisão sistemática. Revista Fitos, 10(1):47-58.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Medrado ARAP, Dantas JBL, Reis JVNA, Barreto RAB, Azavedo JSJ, Julião ELD. (2018). Própolis: um importante aliado na odontologia. iSaúde Brasil.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Calhelha RC, Falcão S, Queiroz MJRP, Vilas-Boas M, Ferreira ICFR. (2014). Cytotoxicity of Portuguese propolis: the proximity of the in vitro doses for tumor and normal cell lines. Biomed. Res. Int, 7. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/897361
Publisher | Google Scholor - Silva-Carvalho R, Baltazar F, Almeida-Aguiar C. (2015). Propolis: a complex natural Product with a plethora of biological activities that can be explored for drug development. Evid. Based Comp. Alter. Med, 1(30):29.
Publisher | Google Scholor