Inadvertent Insertion of a Nasogastric Tube into The Trachea

Case Report

Inadvertent Insertion of a Nasogastric Tube into The Trachea

Gade Sandeep ^*
Nandkishore Agrawal
Mamta Sinha
Suresh Rajwade

Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.

*Corresponding Author: Gade Sandeep,Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.

Citation: Sandeep G, Agrawal N, Sinha M, Rajwade S. (2024). Inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube into the trachea, International Journal of Medical Case Reports and Reviews, BioRes Scientia Publishers. 2(6):1-2. DOI: 10.59657/2837-8172.brs.24.036

Copyright: © 2024 Gade Sandeep, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: November 20, 2023 | Accepted: December 30, 2023 | Published: January 03, 2024

Abstract

Head and neck surgeries requires the insertion of a nasogastric tube. The insertion of a nasogastric tube in an intubated patient can pose challenges, one of which could be the unintentional placement into the trachea. Despite the presence of a correct sized endotracheal tube and adequately inflated cuff, there can be chances of slippage of the nasogastric tube into the trachea hindering ventilation. We describe one such case scenario of how the improper nasogastric tube placement hindered the ventilation of the patient.

Keywords: tube; hand; neck; patient

Introduction

The insertion of a nasogastric tube in head and neck surgeries is required for various reasons including the identification of the oesophagus and post-operative enteral feeding [1]. The placement of a nasogastric tube can sometimes be a daunting task with the possibilities of its entry into the trachea. Hence the correct position and confirmation of the nasogastric tube is important. Insertion of a nasogastric tube in an intubated patient has high first-attempt failure rates [2]. The nasogastric tube can get impacted in the pyriform sinus, the arytenoids and the oesophagus which gets compressed by the inflated cuff of the endotracheal tube leading to difficulty in insertion [3]. Here we describe a case scenario of how unintentional improper nasogastric tube placement hindered the ventilation of the patient.

Case report

A 59-year-old male patient with a diagnosis of carcinoma right border of tongue was planned for wide local excision of the lesion plus right selective neck dissection and primary closure. During the pre-anesthetic checkup patient was examined thoroughly and was cleared for the surgery under The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical status classification 3. In the preoperative area after noting down the baseline vitals (heart rate- 76 bpm, blood pressure- 130/84 mmHg, SpO2: 98% on room air), nasal preparation was done with 0.1% xylometazoline 2 drops instilled in each nostril. In the OR, ASA standard monitors were attached. After adequate pre oxygenation, patient was induced with Inj Midazolam 1 mg iv, Inj Fentanyl 120 mcg, Inj Propofol 140 mg iv. After check ventilation, muscle relaxant Inj Vecuronium 7 mg was administered. After 4 minutes of bag and mask ventilation, 7.5 mm cuffed flex metallic endotracheal tube was inserted through the right nostril. Using Mac blade, direct laryngoscopy was done and with the help of Magill’s forceps, the tube was guided through the cords. Breathing circuit was connected, and position of the tube was confirmed with 5-point auscultation and capnography trace. Patient was then switched over to volume control mode of ventilation. Tube was secured with tapes and eyes were taped. After application of the lubricant, 16 Fr nasogastric tube was inserted through the left nostril using reverse Sellick manoeuvre. Nasogastric tube passed without resistance and at a depth of 45 cm, the position of nasogastric tube was checked by auscultation over the epigastric region. A minute later, leak of about 150 M L was observed in the exhaled tidal volume. FiO2 was increased to 100% and patient switched to manual hand ventilation at a flow rate of 6 L/min. Position of the tube was confirmed by auscultation. Cuff pressure was checked (pressure: 25 mmHg) and was found to be normal. Leak persisted and direct laryngoscopy was done to confirm the position of the cuff. Laryngoscopy revealed normal findings. Suspecting a cuff rupture a decision was made to exchange the tube with a larger endotracheal tube of 8.0 mm. After deepening the plane of anesthesia and adequate oxygenation with 100% O2, 7.5 mm ET tube was removed, and 8.0 mm tube was inserted through the right nostril. While performing direct laryngoscopy to guide the nasal ET tube into the trachea with the help of Magill's forceps, the nasogastric tube was found coiled in the trachea. Although studies have shown successful nasogastric tube insertion in the oesophagus using the reverse Sellick technique, it was not so in our case [4]. The nasogastric tube was then pulled out and guided into the oesophagus while the endotracheal tube was guided into the trachea with the help of Magill’s forceps. The cuff was inflated, and patient was connected to the ventilator. No significant leak was detected. The cuff of the previously removed ET tube was intact suggesting that the leak was not due to the cuff rupture, and consideration must be given to the improper placement of the nasogastric tube, which could have accidentally entered into the trachea.

Conclusion

One has to be vigilant while inserting nasogastric tube and that despite cuff inflation there are possibilities that the nasogastric tube can slip into the trachea. Under anaesthesia, the auscultatory method might not always be the reliable test to confirm the position of nasogastric tube. Hence the accidental placement of a nasogastric tube into the trachea must always be considered.

References

Leong SC, Mahanta V. (2006). Securing the nasogastric tube in head and neck cancer patients. Laryngoscope, 116(11):2089-2091.
Publisher | Google Scholor
Bong CL, Macachor JD, Hwang NC. (2004). Insertion of the nasogastric tube made easy. Anesthesiology, 101:266.
Publisher | Google Scholor
Ozer S, Benumof JL. (1999). Oro-and nasogastric tube passage in intubated patients: Fiberoptic description of where they go at the laryngeal level and how to make them enter the esophagus. Anesthesiology, 91:137-43.
Publisher | Google Scholor
Parris WC. (1989). Reverse sellick manoeuvre Anesth Analg. 68:423.
Publisher | Google Scholor

Delia Teresa Sponza

"Journal of BioMed Research and Reports has created a diverse portfolio in peer review process and provides a wide range scientific and medical novel papers to the scientists. This journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed content across all levels of professional development and corporate research and development."

Fatema Tashrifwala

I would like to thank the editorial team for their timely responses and consideration in the publication of my paper. They have been very helpful and accommodating, Lastly, being an open access journal, the published work is freely available and accessible to readers at no cost to them. I would encourage other authors to publish their research in BioRes Scientia. I am happy to be a part of BioRes Scientia Publishers.

Dr Nikhil Vitthal Dayama

I would like to thank the editorial team for their timely and prompt responses and consideration in the publication of my case report. Being an open access journal, it will be great help for the readers to learn the new things without any cost. I would encourage the authors to publish their research in BioRes Scientia and I am happy to be part of this journal.

Boubacar Ahy Diatta

I warmly thank the editorial team for the excellent work they do for continuing medical education in Dermatology. I was able to discover with joy their professionalist, their support and above all appreciate their social generosity on the access to the magazines which is free. This allows an update of scientific knowledge to the entire scientific community. I gladly recommend authors for publication in this journal.

Professor Rajko Igic

The editor of JBRR helped me during the whole process, mainly to eliminate some typographical and other errors. It hastened this publication to be published quickly. Although it is a short text, I believe that the content is important for all medical and other scientific disciplines because eventual addition of the iC citations to citation of the paper would lead to proper assessment of the author's contribution.

Dr Tewodros kassahun Tarekegn

I am thrilled to have had the opportunity to publish my research article in this prestigious journal. The entire process of peer review and publication support provided by the editorial office was exceptional, and it fortified my belief in the quality of my research study. The rigorous peer review process ensured that only the highest quality research was published, and the feedback from the reviewers was extremely helpful. I appreciate the journal's commitment to open access publication, enabling my research to reach a wider audience. The easy-to-use online platform streamlined the submission, peer review, and publication process, and I would confidently recommend this journal to any author looking for efficient, rigorous, and high-quality peer-reviewed publication.

Francis Okello Ooko

I was impressed by your author-centred approach whereby you maintained constant and timely communication with us from the time we submitted the manuscript to acceptance, each time providing critical suggestions to improve the manuscript. In addition, we are encouraged by the thoroughness of your editorial team in checking the originality and overall, quality of the work. Which I believe is very encouraging to other researchers and authors who wish to publish their work in your journals. The published work and the information imparted is freely available and accessible to a wide spectrum of readers at no cost to them. I would encourage other authors to publish their research in BioRes Scientia. I am happy to be a part of BioRes Scientia Publishers.

Dr Nidhi Sapolia

I would like to thank the editorial team of their timely response and guidance in the publication of my case report. They have been extremely helpful at all stages. Being an open access journal, it is of great help for the readers to learn new experiences in different fields, I would highly recommend this journal to authors for high quality peer-reviewed publications.

Dwight L Mckee MD CNS ABIHM

I am very impressed by the high quality of the papers published by the International Journal of Clinical and Molecular Oncology. The editors of this journal are a pleasure to work with, as they are highly responsive even to numerous last minute changes in the manuscript that I recently published with them, and the changes are made on-line the same day they are received. I highly recommend this journal to anyone working in the oncology field, and also value it as a source of cutting edge information in the field.

Kyaw Swar Thet

I would like to thank the editorial team for the opportunity to publish our case report in this prestigious journal. I am very impressed by their timely and efficient handling of the submission, peer review, and publication processes. As residents of a developing, low-income country, we greatly appreciate the discount on submission charges. I hope that as an open access journal, it will facilitate easy access for readers to update their scientific knowledge. I highly recommend this journal for high-quality, peer-reviewed publications. I express my sincere gratitude to the editorial team for their excellent work.

Michel Farah

I would like to thank the editorial team for their quick response and support. The publication support and editorial office were excellent and very helpful. I am happy to have my research article published in this prestigious journal. Our previous case report published in this journal was very successful and viewed by many physicians worldwide.