Research Article
Parametric Analysis and Numerical Investigation of Biogas Production in Wolaita Sodo Town
- Tesfaye Barza Zema *
Lecturer, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Wolaita Sodo University, Gandaba, Sodo, Ethiopia.
*Corresponding Author: Tesfaye Barza Zema, Lecturer, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Wolaita Sodo University, Gandaba, Sodo, Ethiopia.
Citation: Tesfaye B. Zema. (2025). Parametric Analysis and Numerical Investigation of Biogas Production in Wolaita Sodo Town, Clinical Case Reports and Studies, BioRes Scientia Publishers. 9(5):1-6. DOI: 10.59657/2837-2565.brs.25.232
Copyright: © 2025 Tesfaye Barza Zema, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: January 30, 2025 | Accepted: February 14, 2025 | Published: February 21, 2025
Abstract
This study investigates the parametric analysis and numerical simulation of biogas production in Wolaita Sodo Town, Ethiopia, located in East Africa. Biodegradable municipal solid waste (MSW) was subjected to anaerobic digestion under a 45-day retention period within a mesophilic temperature range of 26°C–43°C. Parameters such as pH, mesophilic and thermophilic temperature ranges, substrate composition, carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio, and hydraulic retention time (HRT) were considered to assess their influence on biogas production. The volume of methane gas generated was 389.5 m³/day with a calorific value of 35 kJ/m³, producing an estimated electrical energy output of 2.265 MWh/day. These findings highlight the feasibility and potential of renewable energy generation from biodegradable waste in developing urban areas.
Keywords: anaerobic digestion; biogas production; municipal solid waste; hydraulic retention time
Introduction
Biogas is a renewable energy source generated from the anaerobic fermentation of organic matter in the absence of oxygen, contained within biogas digesters. The gas is primarily composed of methane (55%–80%) and carbon dioxide (30%–40%), along with smaller amounts of hydrogen, nitrogen, water vapor, and trace amounts of hydrogen sulfide. The biogas production process involves four critical steps: (i) hydrolysis, (ii) fermentation (acidogenesis), (iii) anaerobic oxidation (acetogenesis), and (iv) methanogenesis. In today’s world, the accumulation of municipal, agricultural, and industrial waste poses a significant threat to environmental health. Energy recovery through biogas production offers a sustainable solution to mitigate this challenge by reducing air and water pollution while simultaneously generating clean energy. The adoption of biogas technology promotes the principles of the "Four R's Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Renewable energy—making it an eco-friendly approach to waste management. Wolaita Sodo Town, located in the southern region of Ethiopia, generates substantial amounts of biodegradable municipal solid waste, offering an untapped resource for biogas production. This study explores numerical modeling and parametric analysis of biogas production in the region to provide clean, affordable energy while addressing waste management challenges. The main objectives of this investigation are:
- To analyze and quantify biogas production potential from biodegradable waste in Wolaita Sodo Town.
- To calculate the daily methane production and associated energy generation.
- To promote sustainable energy practices using renewable biogas technology.
- To develop a cost-effective and efficient waste-to-energy system for clean fuel production.
Literature Review
Biogas is recognized as an alternative renewable energy source, produced through the anaerobic digestion of organic materials such as agricultural residues, animal waste, and municipal solid waste. Anaerobic digestion not only generates energy but also reduces atmospheric methane emissions, mitigating the impact of greenhouse gases [1]. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of biogas technology in reducing organic waste and improving environmental health [2]. Despite its potential, the development of biogas technology in Sub-Saharan Africa has faced challenges due to inadequate government policies, lack of technical knowledge, poor digester designs, and limited maintenance support. These limitations have hindered widespread adoption, particularly in rural communities [3]. However, biogas has proven to be a reliable and low-cost energy source for cooking, lighting, and fertilizer production in agriculture-based economies [4]. Various studies highlight the economic feasibility of biogas plants. Research in Sweden, for example, has shown advancements in upgrading biogas for use as a transport fuel, with applications ranging from private cars to public buses and trains, Countries like Sweden and Germany have set benchmarks for biogas technology adoption. Besides, Sweden has introduced biogas as a transport fuel, powering vehicles such as cars, buses, and even trains. This highlights the potential of biogas technology for large-scale applications in Ethiopia, where untapped resources such as agricultural and municipal waste abound. [5]. In developing countries, small-scale biogas digesters have been successfully deployed at the household level, offering an affordable and sustainable energy solution [6]. In Ethiopia, studies on biogas production are limited, especially those focusing on urban areas like Wolaita Sodo Town. This study aims to fill this gap by conducting a detailed parametric analysis and numerical simulation of biogas production potential in the region. The investigation focuses on key parameters such as pH, temperature, substrate composition, C/N ratio, and hydraulic retention time, which significantly influence the efficiency of the anaerobic digestion process [7].
Table 1: Biogas Composition
| Substance | Symbol | Percentage (%) |
| Methane | CH₄ | 50–70 |
| Carbon Dioxide | CO₂ | 30–40 |
| Hydrogen | H₂ | 5.0–10 |
| Nitrogen | N₂ | 1.0–2.0 |
| Water Vapor | H₂O | 0.3 |
| Hydrogen Sulfide | H₂S | Traces |
Materials and Methods
Description of Study Area
Wolaita Sodo is a town and separate woreda in south-central Ethiopia. It serves as the administrative center of the Wolaita Zone in the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region (SNNPR). The town is situated at a latitude of 6°54′N and longitude of 37°45′E, with an elevation ranging from 1,600 to 2,100 meters (5,200 to 6,900 feet) above sea level. The region experiences a subtropical highland climate with moderate rainfall and temperature variations. Wolaita Sodo was previously part of the former Sodo woreda, which included Sodo Zuria, a district that completely surrounds the town. The area is known for its rich agricultural activities, particularly the cultivation of maize, coffee, and enset (false banana), which play a crucial role in local livelihoods. The town also hosts Wolaita Sodo University, serving as a hub for education and research. The study area was selected due to its strategic location, diverse topography, and socioeconomic significance in Ethiopia’s southern region.
Table 2: Physical Composition of Municipal Solid Waste
| SW Category | SW Composition 1 | SW Composition 2 | SW Composition 3 | SW Composition 4 | Total |
| Bio-degradable | Food waste | Wood, leaves, grasses | Paper and cardboard | Textiles (Worn out cloth) | 93.7% |
| Non-biodegradable | Plastics and rubber | Metals | Glass | Electronic wastes | 3.9% |
This version places the categories and compositions in a horizontal layout for a concise overview.
Effect of Methane Gas
Methane gas, primarily generated from the anaerobic digestion of biodegradable solid waste, plays a dual role: Energy Source: Methane serves as a renewable energy source, utilized in the production of electricity, heat, and even as vehicle fuel. This process helps reduce dependence on fossil fuels and contributes to sustainable energy solutions. Furthermore, Environmental Impact: If methane is released untreated into the atmosphere, it significantly contributes to global warming. It is a potent greenhouse gas, with a warming potential 28–36 times greater than CO₂ over 100 years. Therefore, capturing and utilizing methane from waste can mitigate its environmental impact, turning waste into a valuable energy resource while minimizing harmful emissions.
Mathematical Formulation
Volume calculation of digester and hydraulic chamber:
Given data: take detailed data from municipality office of waste management
The total mass (Mt) of bio-degradable solid waste (BSW) collected in the Sodo town =15ton kg/day, Temp=30oC (average, for Mesophilic digester)
Let Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT) = 40 days (for temp. 30 oC) in 8% concentration of total bio-degradable solid waste (To make favorable condition)
8kg solid = 100kg. Effluent (residue that comes out at the outlet after the substrate is digested/processed inside the digester. (1kg solid = 100/8kg. Effluent)
Total fresh discharge =15000kg/day (Solid waste discharge by weight favorable)
Total fresh discharge =15000kg/dayx0.15kg, = 2250kg, Iffluent
Water to be added to make the discharge 8% concentration of bio-degradable solid waste.
Working volume of digester (Vw) = Volume of gas storage chamber + volume of fermentation chamber
(Vw) = Vgs + Vf = Q.HRT
= 15000 Kg/day X 40 days
Vw = 90 m3
Table 3: Geometrical Dimensions of the Cylindrical Biogas Digester
| Parameter | Symbol | Formula / Value |
| Gas collecting chamber | Vc | ≤ 5% V |
| Gas storage chamber | Vgs | 80% V - Vf |
| Fermentation chamber | Vf | 80% V - Vgs |
| Hydraulic chamber | VH | Vgs |
| Sludge layer | Vs | ≤ 15% V |
| Total volume of digester | V | Vc + Vgs + Vf + Vs |
| Gasholder volume | V1 | 0.0827 D³ |
| Sludge layer volume | V2 | 0.05011 D³ |
| Fermentation volume | V3 | 0.3142 D³ |
| Surface area of top dome | S1 | 0.911 D² |
| Surface area of bottom dome | S2 | 0.8345 D² |
| Cylinder diameter | D | 1.0125 × V^(1/3) |
| Dome radius 1 | R1 | 0.725 D |
| Dome radius 2 | R2 | 1.0625 D |
| Height factor 1 | f1 | D / 5 |
| Height factor 2 | f2 | D / 8 |
| Gas production factor | K | 0.4 m³/m³ per day |
| Gas storage equation | Vgs | 0.5 × (Vgs + Vf + Vs) × K |
From the above table, 3
Vw = Vgs + Vf = 0.80 V or V = 90/0.8 = 112.5m3. (Putting value Vgs + Vf = 90m3)
And D = 1.0125 X V1/3 = 1.0125 x (112.5m3)1/3 = 1.0125 x (4.752m) D = 4.81m
Volume of fermentation chamber
F2rom the geometry of the digester, the volume of the ferme chamber V3 can be expressed as: V3 = (π D2/4) x H
Again V3 = (π D2/4) x H (putting V3 =0.3142D3), Say H = 2.00m or H = 2000mm
V3=3.14xD2xH/4 (putting D = 4.81, H = 2m) & V3 ≈ 35 m3
- Using the values of D and H, the remaining dimensions are calculated as follows:
- f1 = D/5 = 4.81 /5 = 0.962m (962mm)
- f2 = D/8 = 4.81 /8 = 0.601m (601.25mm)
- R1 = 0.725 D = 3.487 m (3487.25mm)
- R 2 = 1.0625 D = 5.11 m (5110.62mm)
- V1 = 0.0827 D3 = 9.2m3
- Vc = 0.05V = 5.62m3
Again, from geometrical assumption we find surface area of two dome (S1) and surface area of bottom dome (S2),
S1= 0.911 D2 or S1 = 21m2 & S2 = 0.8345 D2 Or S2 = 19.3 m2
From the above table: To find volume of gas collecting chamber (Vc) and Volume of sludge layer (Vs)
Vc ≤ 5% V and Vs ≤ 15% V, but the value of Vc = 5.62m3& Vs = 16.97 m3
Vgs = 0.50 x (Vgs+ Vf + Vs) x K (Where K = Gas production rate per m3 digester vol./day)
Vgs = 0.5 x 99x 0.4 =19.8m3 -------------------------------------------- (A)
Again, to find Volume of gas storage chamber (Vgs) producing rate of fermentation yields
Vgs = 50% of daily gas yield
= 0.5 x TS x yield of Biogas producing rate per Kg TS
= 0.5 x (2250 kg x 0.15) x 0.28m3/kg TS
= 47.25m3 ------------------------------------------------------------ (B)
From A & B let Vgs = 47.25m3
Vc + Vgs = (5.625+47.25) m3 = 52.875m3
Then we can calculate Total volume of digester V = Vc+Vgs+Vf+Vs = 112.5m3
Gas Production
Gas production rate from bio-degradable waste = 0.05 m3/kg
Retention time (RT): 40 days
Ratio of water 1:1dilution
Total discharge (Td) =2250kg. Iffluent
Volatile solid content (Vs) =0.15
Operating Temperature 30 oC (mesophilic)
Daily Gas Production (G)
Vg = Cs x G where, Cs = storage capacity (%)
Vg = gas holder volume
G =389.5m3/d
Energy generation Calculation:
From the above given value, we can find the gas generation (Q)
(G) = 389.5 m3/d, and 0.6 or 60% Constituent of methane
Calorific value of methane CH4 =35kJ/ m3
Energy generation (Q) = C.V CH4 x Volume of CH4
Volume of methane generation VCH4 = 0.6 x 389.5 =233.7m3/d
But, the total mass of waste (Mt) =15000kg/d
Then Volume of CH4/Mt =233.7m3/d/15000kg/d=0.01558m3/kg
Energy generation (Q) = C.V of CH4 xVCH4 = 0.545MJ/kg or 545KJ/kg
If Methane energy content: 545 kJ/kg (0.151 kwh/kg biogas)
Then 15000 kg /day x 0.151 kWh /kg = 2265 kWh /d = 2.265 MWh/d (electrical energy)
To convert total biogas energy to electrical energy using the combined power and heat (CHP), Electrical conversion efficiency = 35%, therefore 1 m3 biogas = 2.14 kWh (elec). Totally we can generate 389.5 m3 x 2.14 kWh/ m3 = 833.53 kWh/day (elec) electrical energy. This energy is enough to fulfill the demand of Wolaita Sodo town.
Results and Discussion
The numerical results and parametric analysis conducted in this study reveal significant insights into the biogas production potential from biodegradable municipal solid waste in Wolaita Sodo Town. The key parameters such as temperature, pH, C/N ratio, and hydraulic retention time (HRT) all had substantial impacts on the efficiency of biogas production. The results are discussed in detail below:
Biogas Composition
The primary components of biogas produced from the anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste were methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂), as expected. The methane content is a key determinant of the energy value of the biogas. The percentage of methane and other components such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and hydrogen sulfide are presented in Table 1 below:
Table 4: Biogas Composition
| Substance | Symbol | Percentage (%) |
| Methane | CH₄ | 55–70 |
| Carbon Dioxide | CO₂ | 30–40 |
| Hydrogen | H₂ | 5.0–10 |
| Nitrogen | N₂ | 1.0–2.0 |
| Water Vapor | H₂O | 0.3 |
| Hydrogen Sulfide | H₂S | Traces |
The results show that the biogas produced from the waste had a high methane content, which is indicative of a favorable digestion process. Methane is the primary fuel in biogas and can be used for power generation or cooking purposes. The efficiency of methane production is significantly influenced by the operational parameters such as temperature and the C/N ratio of the waste material.
Parametric Analysis
Several key parameters influence biogas production, including temperature, pH, the carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio, and hydraulic retention time (HRT). Maintaining an oxygen-free environment is essential for methanogenic bacteria, ensuring optimal anaerobic digestion [8]. The mesophilic temperature range (30°C–35°C) enhances microbial activity, increasing biogas yield without excessive energy input [9]. pH stability (6.5–7.5) is crucial for microbial balance, preventing acidification or alkalinity issues [10]. A well-mixed substrate ensures uniform digestion, while an optimal C/N ratio (20:1–30:1) balances microbial nutrition [11]. An HRT of 20–40 days maximizes digestion efficiency [12]. Maintaining these conditions significantly improves biogas yield and overall process stability.
Biogas Production Rate and Energy Generation
The daily biogas production rate, based on the calculated substrate input and the operational parameters, was found to be 389.5 m³/day. This value reflects a steady anaerobic digestion process with an efficient conversion of organic matter into biogas.
Table 5: Daily Biogas Production and Energy Generation [13].
| Parameter | Value |
| Daily Biogas Production | 389.5 m³/day |
| Methane Content | 60% |
| Gas Volume (Methane) | 233.7 m³/day |
| Calorific Value of Gas | 35 kJ/m³ |
| Daily Energy Generation | 2.265 MWh/day |
As per Table above, the methane component of the biogas produced was approximately 60% of the total volume, which contributes significantly to the energy generation [14]. Based on this methane content, the total energy output is calculated to be 2.265 MWh/day, which is a substantial amount of energy that could support household electricity needs or be fed into a local grid.
Conclusion
This study evaluates the biogas production potential from biodegradable municipal solid waste in Wolaita Sodo Town. The results indicate that optimal biogas production is achieved with mesophilic temperatures (20°C–40°C), a balanced pH (6.5–7.5), and a C/N ratio of 20:1–30:1. The biogas produced contained approximately 60% methane, contributing to a daily energy generation of 2.265 MWh. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of maintaining optimal hydraulic retention time (HRT) to maximize methane yield. Implementing anaerobic digestion for municipal waste not only reduces landfill dependency but also provides an eco-friendly energy source, promoting environmental sustainability and economic benefits in urban settings.
Nomenclature
| RETs | Renewable energy technologies |
| AD | Aerobic Digestion |
| C/N | Carbon to Nitrogen Ratio |
| MSW | Municipal Solid Waste |
| C/N | Carbon to Nitrogen Ratio |
| HRT | Hydraulic Retention Time |
| pH | Power of Hydrogen |
| TS | Total Solid |
| Sd | Substrate Input |
| VS | Volatile solid |
| SW | Solid Waste |
| V | Volume |
| m3 | Meter cube |
| Kpa | kilo Pascal |
| Gd | Specific Gas Production per day |
References
- Abdullahi, Y., Ayi, F., Okuneye, R. (2024). Trends in Sports and Exercise Science, Physical Education and Sports. Global Journal of Health-Related Researches, 6(1):89-95.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Abdullahi, Y., Okuneye, R. O., Eboh, E. I., Sharaye, K. O. (2024). Collaborative Synergy of Sports Scientists and Physiotherapists.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Abdullah, K. H., Sofyan, D., Kamaruddin, H. K., Osiobe, E. U. (2024). Sports and Nutrition: A Scientometric Review.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Kessel, A. (2016). Eat Sweat Play: How Sport Can Change Our Lives. Pan Macmillan.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Arzehgar, A., Seyedhasani, S. N., Ahmadi, F. B., Bagheri Baravati, F., Sadeghi Hesar, A., et al. (2025). Sensor-Based Technologies for Motion Analysis in Sports Injuries: A Scoping Review. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17(1):15.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Bae, M. (2024). Biopsychosocial Approach to Sports Injury: A Systematic Review and Exploration of Knowledge Structure. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 16(1):242.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Barakou, I., Seves, B. L., Abonie, U. S., Finch, T., Hackett, K. L., et al. (2025). Health-Related Quality of Life Associated with Fatigue, Physical Activity and Activity Pacing in Adults with Chronic Conditions. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17(1):13.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Bartlett, J. D., Drust, B. (2021). A Framework for Effective Knowledge Translation and Performance Delivery of Sport Scientists in Professional Sport. European Journal of Sport Science, 21(11):1579-1587.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Brocherie, F., Beard, A. (2021). All Alone We Go Faster, Together We Go Further: The Necessary Evolution of Professional and Elite Sporting Environment to Bridge the Gap Between Research and Practice. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2:631147.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Casamichana, D., Barreira, J., Castellano, J., Barba, E., Erkizia, B., et al. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Weekly and Accumulated Pre-Season External Load In a Professional Women’s Soccer Team and Its Reserve Team. Sport Sciences for Health, 1-9.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ghorbani, M., Yaali, R., Sadeghi, H. (2025). The Impact of Calisthenics on Muscular Endurance, Balance, And Agility in Young Females with and Without Flexible Flatfeet: A Comparative Study. Sport Sciences for Health, 1-10.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Gredin, N. V., Okholm Kryger, K., McCall, A., Solstad, B. E., Torstveit, M. K., et al. (2025). Psychology Research in Women’s Soccer: A Scoping Review. Science and Medicine in Football, 9(1):1-11.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Jankowski, M. (2019). The greatest football players of all time. Gareth Stevens Publishing.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Jing, R., Wang, Z., Mee-Seong, C. (2025). Interventional Effects of Different Track and Field Sports on Human Cardiovascular Function Indicators and Physiological Energy Metabolism. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17(1):1-11.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Klein, T., Worth, A., Niessner, C., Hanssen-Doose, A. (2025). Remote Assessment of Physical Fitness Via Videoconferencing: A Systematic Review. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17(1):11.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Kubayi, A., Coopoo, Y., Toriola, A. (2018). Analysis of Sports Science Perceptions and Research Needs Among South African Coaches. South African Journal of Sports Medicine, 30(1).
Publisher | Google Scholor - Liu, Q., Wang, W., Shu, C. (2024). Effects of Short Sprint Interval Training Frequency on Physical and Physiological Performance Adaptations in Male Soccer Players. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 23(4):707-717.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Zhang, Bei & Wang, Xiong & Li, Haipeng & Jiang, Zili & Zi, Wei, et al. (2020). Merging of Sports Science and Practice: Facts, Barriers, Recommendations.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Mancin, L., Burke, L. M., Rollo, I. (2025). Fibre: The Forgotten Carbohydrate in Sports Nutrition Recommendations. Sports Medicine, 1-17.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Maneiro, R., Iván-Baragaño, I., Losada, J. L., Ardá, A., Amatria, M., et al. (2025). Advances in Sport Science: Latest Findings and New Scientific Proposals, Volume II. Frontiers in Psychology, 16:1550371.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Marwaha, E. B., Sharma, A., Arora, K. (2025). Unfolding The Aggression and Locus of Control Paradigm in Sportspersons and Non-Sportspersons. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 20(1):144-156.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Matagi, S. O. (2023). The Surging of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research. 10(3):1-5.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Mookherji, K. (2021). 20 Greatest Sport Stars of The World: Bestseller Book by Kalyani Mookherji: 20 Greatest Sport Stars of The World. Prabhat Prakashan.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Oviedo-Caro, M. Á., Sanchez-Trigo, H. (2024). Special Issue on Innovative Approaches in The Implementation of Technology in Sports Science and Engineering. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 238(2):115-116.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Raiola, G., Esposito, G., Aliberti, S., Ceruso, R., D’Elia, F. (2025). Scientific Relevance and Affinity in The Declarations of The Groups and Academic Disciplines in Physical Exercise and Sport Sciences. Sport Sciences for Health, 1-7.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Reinmann, A., Laré, E., Bruyneel, A. V., Gligorov, J., Bodmer, A., et al. (2025). Can a Physical Activity Program Improve Functional Capacity and Fatigue in People with Cancer? A Retrospective Analysis. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17(1):21.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Schwarz, E., Harper, L. D., Duffield, R., McCunn, R., Govus, A., et al. (2021). Practitioner, Coach, And Athlete Perceptions of Evidence-Based Practice in Professional Sport in Australia. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 16(12):1728-1735.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Sun, Z., Liu, X., Fu, H., Shen, S., Zhou, X. (2025). Comparisons of the Anthropometric and Physical Characteristics of Young Elite Chinese Male Soccer Players by Age and Playing Position. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17(1):22.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Tézier, B., Barros, K., Geidne, S., Bardid, F., Grieco, S., et al. (2025). The Health Promoting Sports Coach: Theoretical Background and Practical Guidance. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17(1):17.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Wijaya, A., Al Ardha, M.A., Nurhasan, N., Yang, C.B., Lin, R.H., et al. (2024). Exploring The Research Trend and Development of Sports Science Technology in The Last 4 Decades: Systematic Review. Challenges: New Trends in Physical Education, Sport and Recreation, 61:655-667.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Zhou, Z., Chen, Y., Huang, K., Zeng, F., Liang, Z., et al. (2024). Relationship Between Physical Fitness and Executive Function in Preschool Children: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 16(1):1-9.
Publisher | Google Scholor
